Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Matt Nieto Mattias Janmark

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Nieto: Goals, 0.11 a game, 26th percentileMatt Nieto: Assists, 0.19 a game, 35th percentileMatt Nieto: Points, 0.30 a game, 29th percentileMatt Nieto: Shots, 1.21 a game, 24th percentileMatt Nieto: Hits, 0.53 a game, 21st percentileMatt Nieto: Corsi for %, 51.9%, 67th percentileMatt Nieto: CF% rel, 0.5, 49th percentileMatt Nieto: On-ice xG %, 50.1%, 48th percentileMatt Nieto: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 30th percentileMatt Nieto: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 20th percentileMatt Nieto: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 57th percentileMatt Nieto: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 36th percentileMattias Janmark: Goals, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileMattias Janmark: Assists, 0.24 a game, 50th percentileMattias Janmark: Points, 0.34 a game, 36th percentileMattias Janmark: Shots, 1.39 a game, 34th percentileMattias Janmark: Hits, 0.35 a game, 9th percentileMattias Janmark: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 49th percentileMattias Janmark: CF% rel, 0.7, 51st percentileMattias Janmark: On-ice xG %, 52.4%, 66th percentileMattias Janmark: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 58th percentileMattias Janmark: Chances created, 0.56 xG per 60, 14th percentileMattias Janmark: Shot quality, 7.2% a shot, 20th percentileMattias Janmark: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 13th percentile
05101520204060Matt Nieto 21Mattias Janmark 21

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Nieto
Mattias Janmark

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Nieto L, PIT 2019-20 Mattias Janmark C, EDM
70 Games played 62
8 Goals 6
13 Assists 15
21 Points 21
0.30 Points per game 0.34
7 Plus/minus -5
85 Shots 86
9.4 Shooting % 7.0
37 Hits 22
6 Penalty minutes 12
13:30 Average ice time 14:37
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.9 Corsi for % 50.4
+0.5 CF% relative to team +0.7
51.4 Fenwick for % 50.3
50.1 Expected goals for % 52.4
-2.9 xGF% relative to team +0.1
53.7 Goals for % 40.9
100.5 PDO 97.7
128 Shot attempts taken 121
Expected goals, all situations
9.5 Expected goals 8.5
0.60 Expected goals per 60 0.56
8.2% Chance per attempt 7.2%
-1.5 Goals above expected -3.5
Rating, in goals
+0.8 Goals above replacement +3.1
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.5
-1.2 Even-strength offence -2.4
-1.0 Even-strength defence +1.3
+0.3 Power play +0.2
-0.3 Penalty kill +0.8
+0.5 Penalties +0.7
Contract
$1.975M Cap hit $2.3M
$94K Cap dollars per point $110K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate $3.3M
-$605K Value: worth minus cap hit +$997K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean