Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Matt Nieto Austin Czarnik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerMatt Nieto: Goals, 0.12 a game, 32nd percentileMatt Nieto: Assists, 0.10 a game, 19th percentileMatt Nieto: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileMatt Nieto: Shots, 1.44 a game, 40th percentileMatt Nieto: Hits, 0.69 a game, 30th percentileMatt Nieto: Corsi for %, 52.1%, 72nd percentileMatt Nieto: CF% rel, 1.6, 64th percentileMatt Nieto: On-ice xG %, 48.5%, 40th percentileMatt Nieto: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 37th percentileMatt Nieto: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 14th percentileMatt Nieto: Shot quality, 7.1% a shot, 33rd percentileMatt Nieto: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 35th percentileAustin Czarnik: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileAustin Czarnik: Assists, 0.16 a game, 35th percentileAustin Czarnik: Points, 0.27 a game, 29th percentileAustin Czarnik: Shots, 1.35 a game, 34th percentileAustin Czarnik: Hits, 0.39 a game, 9th percentileAustin Czarnik: Corsi for %, 54.5%, 89th percentileAustin Czarnik: CF% rel, -1.3, 32nd percentileAustin Czarnik: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileAustin Czarnik: Rating, +2.7 goals above replacement, 48th percentileAustin Czarnik: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 22nd percentileAustin Czarnik: Shot quality, 6.3% a shot, 11th percentileAustin Czarnik: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 41st percentile
05102040Matt Nieto 13Austin Czarnik 13

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Matt Nieto
Austin Czarnik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Matt Nieto L, PIT 2016-17 Austin Czarnik C, DET
59 Games played 49
7 Goals 5
6 Assists 8
13 Points 13
0.22 Points per game 0.27
-12 Plus/minus -10
85 Shots 66
8.2 Shooting % 7.6
41 Hits 19
8 Penalty minutes 12
14:55 Average ice time 13:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
52.1 Corsi for % 54.5
+1.6 CF% relative to team -1.3
50.8 Fenwick for % 55.7
48.5 Expected goals for % 53.0
+0.2 xGF% relative to team -3.1
34.1 Goals for % 38.7
96.2 PDO 95.5
119 Shot attempts taken 87
Expected goals, all situations
7.7 Expected goals 6.2
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.59
7.1% Chance per attempt 6.3%
-1.7 Goals above expected -1.2
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement +2.7
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.4
-3.1 Even-strength offence -1.8
+2.1 Even-strength defence +1.1
-0.5 Power play -0.4
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.7
+0.6 Penalties +1.2
Contract
$735K Cap hit $818K
$57K Cap dollars per point $63K
$1.6M Worth at the going rate $2.3M
+$835K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean