Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Scott Harrington David Schlemko

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Harrington: Goals, 0.06 a game, 50th percentileScott Harrington: Assists, 0.09 a game, 11th percentileScott Harrington: Points, 0.16 a game, 19th percentileScott Harrington: Shots, 0.88 a game, 11th percentileScott Harrington: Hits, 1.09 a game, 41st percentileScott Harrington: Corsi for %, 43.8%, 4th percentileScott Harrington: CF% rel, -7.9, 1st percentileScott Harrington: On-ice xG %, 40.1%, 1st percentileScott Harrington: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileScott Harrington: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 33rd percentileScott Harrington: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 42nd percentileScott Harrington: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentileDavid Schlemko: Goals, 0.03 a game, 19th percentileDavid Schlemko: Assists, 0.11 a game, 17th percentileDavid Schlemko: Points, 0.14 a game, 13th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shots, 1.03 a game, 25th percentileDavid Schlemko: Hits, 0.89 a game, 29th percentileDavid Schlemko: Corsi for %, 49.1%, 39th percentileDavid Schlemko: CF% rel, -2.8, 22nd percentileDavid Schlemko: On-ice xG %, 52.5%, 74th percentileDavid Schlemko: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 38th percentileDavid Schlemko: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 24th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 52nd percentileDavid Schlemko: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 38th percentile
01234520Scott Harrington 5David Schlemko 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Harrington
David Schlemko

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Harrington D, ANA 2017-18 David Schlemko D, MTL
32 Games played 37
2 Goals 1
3 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.16 Points per game 0.14
0 Plus/minus 3
28 Shots 38
7.1 Shooting % 2.6
35 Hits 33
8 Penalty minutes 6
13:18 Average ice time 18:04
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.8 Corsi for % 49.1
-7.9 CF% relative to team -2.8
44.4 Fenwick for % 49.5
40.1 Expected goals for % 52.5
-8.5 xGF% relative to team +0.1
51.7 Goals for % 52.4
102.1 PDO 100.8
52 Shot attempts taken 75
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 1.6
0.17 Expected goals per 60 0.14
2.9% Chance per attempt 3.1%
+0.8 Goals above expected -0.6
Rating, in goals
-0.8 Goals above replacement +0.9
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
-1.6 Even-strength offence -1.7
-0.2 Even-strength defence +1.0
+0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.4
-0.6 Penalties 0.0
Contract
$675K Cap hit $2.1M
$135K Cap dollars per point $420K
$76K Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$599K Value: worth minus cap hit -$905K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean