Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Scott Harrington Brett Kulak

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Harrington: Goals, 0.05 a game, 41st percentileScott Harrington: Assists, 0.09 a game, 10th percentileScott Harrington: Points, 0.14 a game, 13th percentileScott Harrington: Shots, 0.73 a game, 7th percentileScott Harrington: Hits, 0.95 a game, 36th percentileScott Harrington: Corsi for %, 47.5%, 23rd percentileScott Harrington: CF% rel, -4.5, 9th percentileScott Harrington: On-ice xG %, 51.4%, 64th percentileScott Harrington: Rating, +0.4 goals above replacement, 37th percentileScott Harrington: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 47th percentileScott Harrington: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 65th percentileScott Harrington: Finishing, +0.2 goals above expected, 59th percentileBrett Kulak: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrett Kulak: Assists, 0.14 a game, 29th percentileBrett Kulak: Points, 0.14 a game, 16th percentileBrett Kulak: Shots, 0.90 a game, 19th percentileBrett Kulak: Hits, 0.67 a game, 17th percentileBrett Kulak: Corsi for %, 50.4%, 59th percentileBrett Kulak: CF% rel, 1.0, 67th percentileBrett Kulak: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 23rd percentileBrett Kulak: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 21st percentileBrett Kulak: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 24th percentileBrett Kulak: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 12th percentileBrett Kulak: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 41st percentile
012320Scott Harrington 3Brett Kulak 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Harrington
Brett Kulak

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Harrington D, ANA 2016-17 Brett Kulak D, COL
22 Games played 21
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.14 Points per game 0.14
3 Plus/minus -3
16 Shots 19
6.3 Shooting % 0.0
21 Hits 14
10 Penalty minutes 12
13:00 Average ice time 14:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.5 Corsi for % 50.4
-4.5 CF% relative to team +1.0
48.0 Fenwick for % 47.2
51.4 Expected goals for % 47.0
+1.1 xGF% relative to team -1.9
56.5 Goals for % 38.9
102.3 PDO 97.9
35 Shot attempts taken 51
Expected goals, all situations
0.8 Expected goals 0.7
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.14
3.4% Chance per attempt 2.3%
+0.2 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
+0.4 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.6 Even-strength offence -0.5
+0.7 Even-strength defence -0.4
0.0 Power play -0.1
-0.2 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.5 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$633K Cap hit $657K
$211K Cap dollars per point $219K
$851K Worth at the going rate $95K
+$218K Value: worth minus cap hit -$562K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean