Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2018-19 season

At a glance

Scott Harrington Matt Benning

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Harrington: Goals, 0.03 a game, 23rd percentileScott Harrington: Assists, 0.21 a game, 51st percentileScott Harrington: Points, 0.23 a game, 40th percentileScott Harrington: Shots, 0.74 a game, 6th percentileScott Harrington: Hits, 1.00 a game, 34th percentileScott Harrington: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 21st percentileScott Harrington: CF% rel, -3.4, 17th percentileScott Harrington: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 32nd percentileScott Harrington: Rating, +0.3 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileScott Harrington: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 44th percentileScott Harrington: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 66th percentileScott Harrington: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 34th percentileMatt Benning: Goals, 0.07 a game, 60th percentileMatt Benning: Assists, 0.17 a game, 36th percentileMatt Benning: Points, 0.24 a game, 43rd percentileMatt Benning: Shots, 1.34 a game, 50th percentileMatt Benning: Hits, 1.56 a game, 63rd percentileMatt Benning: Corsi for %, 48.2%, 33rd percentileMatt Benning: CF% rel, 0.4, 55th percentileMatt Benning: On-ice xG %, 48.8%, 43rd percentileMatt Benning: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 52nd percentileMatt Benning: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 37th percentileMatt Benning: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 13th percentileMatt Benning: Finishing, +1.9 goals above expected, 84th percentile
051015204060Scott Harrington 17Matt Benning 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Harrington
Matt Benning

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Harrington D, ANA 2018-19 Matt Benning D, TOR
73 Games played 70
2 Goals 5
15 Assists 12
17 Points 17
0.23 Points per game 0.24
6 Plus/minus 11
54 Shots 94
3.7 Shooting % 5.3
73 Hits 109
23 Penalty minutes 33
13:03 Average ice time 14:57
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.3 Corsi for % 48.2
-3.4 CF% relative to team +0.4
48.4 Fenwick for % 47.2
47.7 Expected goals for % 48.8
-3.6 xGF% relative to team +2.1
51.5 Goals for % 55.8
100.7 PDO 102.5
111 Shot attempts taken 163
Expected goals, all situations
3.1 Expected goals 3.1
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.18
3.6% Chance per attempt 2.4%
-1.1 Goals above expected +1.9
Rating, in goals
+0.3 Goals above replacement +1.9
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.7 Even-strength offence -0.5
-2.3 Even-strength defence +0.3
0.0 Power play -0.7
+0.6 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.4 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$675K Cap hit $1.9M
$40K Cap dollars per point $112K
$813K Worth at the going rate $1.9M
+$138K Value: worth minus cap hit +$48K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean