Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Scott Harrington Trevor van Riemsdyk

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerScott Harrington: Goals, 0.03 a game, 19th percentileScott Harrington: Assists, 0.18 a game, 43rd percentileScott Harrington: Points, 0.21 a game, 33rd percentileScott Harrington: Shots, 0.95 a game, 17th percentileScott Harrington: Hits, 1.18 a game, 49th percentileScott Harrington: Corsi for %, 46.3%, 18th percentileScott Harrington: CF% rel, -3.5, 21st percentileScott Harrington: On-ice xG %, 48.1%, 38th percentileScott Harrington: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 31st percentileScott Harrington: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 46th percentileScott Harrington: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 44th percentileScott Harrington: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 36th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Goals, 0.02 a game, 14th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Assists, 0.14 a game, 26th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Points, 0.16 a game, 22nd percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Shots, 1.18 a game, 36th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Hits, 0.43 a game, 6th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Corsi for %, 52.9%, 84th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: CF% rel, -1.4, 39th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: On-ice xG %, 52.6%, 73rd percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Rating, +1.5 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Chances created, 0.13 xG per 60, 14th percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Shot quality, 2.0% a shot, 3rd percentileTrevor van Riemsdyk: Finishing, -0.5 goals above expected, 40th percentile
024682040Scott Harrington 8Trevor van Riemsdyk 8

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Scott Harrington
Trevor van Riemsdyk

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Scott Harrington D, ANA 2019-20 Trevor van Riemsdyk D, PIT
39 Games played 49
1 Goals 1
7 Assists 7
8 Points 8
0.21 Points per game 0.16
-3 Plus/minus -7
37 Shots 58
2.7 Shooting % 1.7
46 Hits 21
16 Penalty minutes 10
13:57 Average ice time 14:52
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.3 Corsi for % 52.9
-3.5 CF% relative to team -1.4
49.1 Fenwick for % 51.5
48.1 Expected goals for % 52.6
-2.3 xGF% relative to team +0.6
43.3 Goals for % 42.3
98.5 PDO 97.4
71 Shot attempts taken 108
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.5
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.13
3.0% Chance per attempt 2.0%
-0.7 Goals above expected -0.5
Rating, in goals
-0.5 Goals above replacement +1.5
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.5 Even-strength offence -2.4
-0.4 Even-strength defence +1.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-1.3 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$1.633M Cap hit $2.3M
$204K Cap dollars per point $288K
$268K Worth at the going rate $1.9M
-$1.4M Value: worth minus cap hit -$365K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean