Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Nathan Beaulieu John Moore

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNathan Beaulieu: Goals, 0.03 a game, 32nd percentileNathan Beaulieu: Assists, 0.27 a game, 70th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Points, 0.30 a game, 65th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Shots, 1.16 a game, 45th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Hits, 0.92 a game, 36th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Corsi for %, 51.2%, 66th percentileNathan Beaulieu: CF% rel, -0.8, 43rd percentileNathan Beaulieu: On-ice xG %, 49.6%, 46th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Rating, +1.3 goals above replacement, 44th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 47th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Shot quality, 3.4% a shot, 64th percentileNathan Beaulieu: Finishing, -1.4 goals above expected, 23rd percentileJohn Moore: Goals, 0.05 a game, 53rd percentileJohn Moore: Assists, 0.21 a game, 56th percentileJohn Moore: Points, 0.26 a game, 56th percentileJohn Moore: Shots, 1.45 a game, 63rd percentileJohn Moore: Hits, 1.27 a game, 53rd percentileJohn Moore: Corsi for %, 43.8%, 2nd percentileJohn Moore: CF% rel, -3.3, 20th percentileJohn Moore: On-ice xG %, 45.5%, 13th percentileJohn Moore: Rating, -2.3 goals above replacement, 7th percentileJohn Moore: Chances created, 0.21 xG per 60, 58th percentileJohn Moore: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 57th percentileJohn Moore: Finishing, -1.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
051015204060Nathan Beaulieu 19John Moore 19

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nathan Beaulieu
John Moore

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nathan Beaulieu D, ANA 2015-16 John Moore D, BOS
64 Games played 73
2 Goals 4
17 Assists 15
19 Points 19
0.30 Points per game 0.26
-6 Plus/minus -12
74 Shots 106
2.7 Shooting % 3.8
59 Hits 93
55 Penalty minutes 28
17:27 Average ice time 19:50
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.2 Corsi for % 43.8
-0.8 CF% relative to team -3.3
50.2 Fenwick for % 44.2
49.6 Expected goals for % 45.5
-2.2 xGF% relative to team -4.2
46.6 Goals for % 42.7
98.5 PDO 100.0
119 Shot attempts taken 167
Expected goals, all situations
3.4 Expected goals 5.1
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.21
3.4% Chance per attempt 3.3%
-1.4 Goals above expected -1.1
Rating, in goals
+1.3 Goals above replacement -2.3
+0.2 Wins above replacement -0.4
-0.1 Even-strength offence -1.0
-0.8 Even-strength defence -4.9
-0.8 Power play -0.5
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.5
-0.5 Penalties -1.3
Contract
$1M Cap hit $1.667M
$53K Cap dollars per point $88K
$1.4M Worth at the going rate -$917K
+$392K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.6M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean