Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Phillip Danault Adam Cracknell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPhillip Danault: Goals, 0.08 a game, 19th percentilePhillip Danault: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentilePhillip Danault: Points, 0.20 a game, 21st percentilePhillip Danault: Shots, 1.41 a game, 39th percentilePhillip Danault: Hits, 0.88 a game, 37th percentilePhillip Danault: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 62nd percentilePhillip Danault: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentilePhillip Danault: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 30th percentilePhillip Danault: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentilePhillip Danault: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 13th percentilePhillip Danault: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 4th percentilePhillip Danault: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 28th percentileAdam Cracknell: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileAdam Cracknell: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileAdam Cracknell: Points, 0.19 a game, 21st percentileAdam Cracknell: Shots, 1.31 a game, 34th percentileAdam Cracknell: Hits, 2.38 a game, 90th percentileAdam Cracknell: Corsi for %, 46.9%, 22nd percentileAdam Cracknell: CF% rel, -0.3, 43rd percentileAdam Cracknell: On-ice xG %, 44.7%, 13th percentileAdam Cracknell: Rating, +2.1 goals above replacement, 44th percentileAdam Cracknell: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 22nd percentileAdam Cracknell: Shot quality, 6.4% a shot, 18th percentileAdam Cracknell: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 44th percentile
02468102040Phillip Danault 10Adam Cracknell 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Phillip Danault
Adam Cracknell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Phillip Danault C, MTL 2015-16 Adam Cracknell R, ANA
51 Games played 52
4 Goals 5
6 Assists 5
10 Points 10
0.20 Points per game 0.19
-5 Plus/minus -1
72 Shots 68
5.6 Shooting % 7.4
45 Hits 124
14 Penalty minutes 20
12:45 Average ice time 12:14
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.3 Corsi for % 46.9
+2.7 CF% relative to team -0.3
51.1 Fenwick for % 46.9
47.6 Expected goals for % 44.7
-1.2 xGF% relative to team -1.1
34.5 Goals for % 44.0
96.5 PDO 99.5
118 Shot attempts taken 116
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 5.9
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.55
5.6% Chance per attempt 6.4%
-2.4 Goals above expected -0.9
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement +2.1
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.8 Even-strength offence -1.5
+1.3 Even-strength defence +1.5
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.7 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.1 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$863K Cap hit $575K
$86K Cap dollars per point $58K
$336K Worth at the going rate $1.9M
-$527K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean