Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Phillip Danault Bobby Farnham

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPhillip Danault: Goals, 0.08 a game, 19th percentilePhillip Danault: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentilePhillip Danault: Points, 0.20 a game, 21st percentilePhillip Danault: Shots, 1.41 a game, 39th percentilePhillip Danault: Hits, 0.88 a game, 37th percentilePhillip Danault: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 62nd percentilePhillip Danault: CF% rel, 2.7, 76th percentilePhillip Danault: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 30th percentilePhillip Danault: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentilePhillip Danault: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 13th percentilePhillip Danault: Shot quality, 5.6% a shot, 4th percentilePhillip Danault: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 28th percentileBobby Farnham: Goals, 0.15 a game, 47th percentileBobby Farnham: Assists, 0.04 a game, 3rd percentileBobby Farnham: Points, 0.19 a game, 19th percentileBobby Farnham: Shots, 0.94 a game, 13th percentileBobby Farnham: Hits, 1.75 a game, 75th percentileBobby Farnham: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 7th percentileBobby Farnham: CF% rel, -1.7, 28th percentileBobby Farnham: On-ice xG %, 46.9%, 26th percentileBobby Farnham: Rating, +1.2 goals above replacement, 35th percentileBobby Farnham: Chances created, 0.53 xG per 60, 18th percentileBobby Farnham: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 10th percentileBobby Farnham: Finishing, +3.6 goals above expected, 82nd percentile
02468102040Phillip Danault 10Bobby Farnham 10

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Phillip Danault
Bobby Farnham

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Phillip Danault C, MTL 2015-16 Bobby Farnham R, MTL
51 Games played 53
4 Goals 8
6 Assists 2
10 Points 10
0.20 Points per game 0.19
-5 Plus/minus -2
72 Shots 50
5.6 Shooting % 16.0
45 Hits 93
14 Penalty minutes 97
12:45 Average ice time 9:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
51.3 Corsi for % 44.3
+2.7 CF% relative to team -1.7
51.1 Fenwick for % 46.2
47.6 Expected goals for % 46.9
-1.2 xGF% relative to team -1.7
34.5 Goals for % 46.2
96.5 PDO 99.9
118 Shot attempts taken 86
Expected goals, all situations
5.4 Expected goals 4.4
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.53
5.6% Chance per attempt 6.0%
-2.4 Goals above expected +3.6
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement +1.2
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.2
-2.8 Even-strength offence -1.6
+1.3 Even-strength defence +1.3
-0.1 Power play 0.0
-0.7 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.1 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$863K Cap hit $575K
$86K Cap dollars per point $58K
$336K Worth at the going rate $1.3M
-$527K Value: worth minus cap hit +$774K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean