Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Phillip Danault Martin Frk

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerPhillip Danault: Goals, 0.15 a game, 41st percentilePhillip Danault: Assists, 0.33 a game, 70th percentilePhillip Danault: Points, 0.48 a game, 60th percentilePhillip Danault: Shots, 1.81 a game, 57th percentilePhillip Danault: Hits, 1.13 a game, 60th percentilePhillip Danault: Corsi for %, 53.1%, 83rd percentilePhillip Danault: CF% rel, 3.4, 84th percentilePhillip Danault: On-ice xG %, 52.3%, 69th percentilePhillip Danault: Rating, +3.8 goals above replacement, 59th percentilePhillip Danault: Chances created, 0.61 xG per 60, 26th percentilePhillip Danault: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 48th percentilePhillip Danault: Finishing, -2.8 goals above expected, 26th percentileMartin Frk: Goals, 0.16 a game, 43rd percentileMartin Frk: Assists, 0.21 a game, 43rd percentileMartin Frk: Points, 0.37 a game, 43rd percentileMartin Frk: Shots, 1.46 a game, 36th percentileMartin Frk: Hits, 1.13 a game, 59th percentileMartin Frk: Corsi for %, 50.0%, 48th percentileMartin Frk: CF% rel, 1.3, 62nd percentileMartin Frk: On-ice xG %, 46.8%, 22nd percentileMartin Frk: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 14th percentileMartin Frk: Chances created, 0.76 xG per 60, 53rd percentileMartin Frk: Shot quality, 6.2% a shot, 10th percentileMartin Frk: Finishing, +2.2 goals above expected, 70th percentile
0510152025204060Phillip Danault 25Martin Frk 25

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Phillip Danault
Martin Frk

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Phillip Danault C, MTL 2017-18 Martin Frk R, LAK
52 Games played 68
8 Goals 11
17 Assists 14
25 Points 25
0.48 Points per game 0.37
0 Plus/minus -14
94 Shots 99
8.5 Shooting % 11.1
59 Hits 77
34 Penalty minutes 14
16:35 Average ice time 10:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.1 Corsi for % 50.0
+3.4 CF% relative to team +1.3
52.7 Fenwick for % 48.7
52.3 Expected goals for % 46.8
+1.7 xGF% relative to team -3.0
47.1 Goals for % 42.2
98.3 PDO 98.9
127 Shot attempts taken 85
Expected goals, all situations
8.8 Expected goals 8.8
0.61 Expected goals per 60 0.76
7.5% Chance per attempt 6.2%
-2.8 Goals above expected +2.2
Rating, in goals
+3.8 Goals above replacement -0.8
+0.6 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.2 Even-strength offence -1.4
+2.0 Even-strength defence -1.4
-0.5 Power play +0.3
-1.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.7 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$913K Cap hit $650K
$37K Cap dollars per point $26K
$3.1M Worth at the going rate $130K
+$2.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$520K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean