Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Seth Griffith Garnet Hathaway

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerSeth Griffith: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileSeth Griffith: Assists, 0.21 a game, 45th percentileSeth Griffith: Points, 0.21 a game, 19th percentileSeth Griffith: Shots, 0.88 a game, 10th percentileSeth Griffith: Hits, 1.25 a game, 64th percentileSeth Griffith: Corsi for %, 54.1%, 87th percentileSeth Griffith: CF% rel, 4.6, 90th percentileSeth Griffith: On-ice xG %, 55.0%, 87th percentileSeth Griffith: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 40th percentileSeth Griffith: Chances created, 0.68 xG per 60, 43rd percentileSeth Griffith: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 81st percentileSeth Griffith: Finishing, -3.5 goals above expected, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.04 a game, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.15 a game, 31st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.19 a game, 17th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.85 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 2.15 a game, 89th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 6th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, -5.4, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 42.9%, 5th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +0.7 goals above replacement, 30th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 23rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.5% a shot, 47th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
01234520Seth Griffith 5Garnet Hathaway 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Seth Griffith
Garnet Hathaway

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Seth Griffith C, EDM 2016-17 Garnet Hathaway R, FLA
24 Games played 26
0 Goals 1
5 Assists 4
5 Points 5
0.21 Points per game 0.19
6 Plus/minus 0
21 Shots 22
0.0 Shooting % 4.5
30 Hits 56
8 Penalty minutes 44
12:44 Average ice time 9:08
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.1 Corsi for % 44.6
+4.6 CF% relative to team -5.4
54.0 Fenwick for % 43.4
55.0 Expected goals for % 42.9
+12.6 xGF% relative to team -7.4
71.4 Goals for % 50.0
103.7 PDO 102.5
39 Shot attempts taken 38
Expected goals, all situations
3.5 Expected goals 2.3
0.68 Expected goals per 60 0.59
8.7% Chance per attempt 7.5%
-3.5 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
+1.8 Goals above replacement +0.7
+0.3 Wins above replacement +0.1
+0.2 Even-strength offence -0.9
+0.7 Even-strength defence +0.4
+0.0 Power play 0.0
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$625K Cap hit $690K
$125K Cap dollars per point $138K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $1.1M
+$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$362K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean