Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Barclay Goodrow David Moss

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBarclay Goodrow: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Assists, 0.13 a game, 26th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Shots, 1.13 a game, 20th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Hits, 1.27 a game, 52nd percentileBarclay Goodrow: Corsi for %, 47.3%, 27th percentileBarclay Goodrow: CF% rel, -5.3, 9th percentileBarclay Goodrow: On-ice xG %, 49.2%, 43rd percentileBarclay Goodrow: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileBarclay Goodrow: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 17th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 8th percentileBarclay Goodrow: Finishing, -1.6 goals above expected, 38th percentileDavid Moss: Goals, 0.07 a game, 14th percentileDavid Moss: Assists, 0.13 a game, 26th percentileDavid Moss: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileDavid Moss: Shots, 1.60 a game, 45th percentileDavid Moss: Hits, 1.92 a game, 77th percentileDavid Moss: Corsi for %, 49.3%, 38th percentileDavid Moss: CF% rel, 0.6, 52nd percentileDavid Moss: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 61st percentileDavid Moss: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 46th percentileDavid Moss: Chances created, 0.89 xG per 60, 81st percentileDavid Moss: Shot quality, 8.7% a shot, 86th percentileDavid Moss: Finishing, -7.5 goals above expected, 2nd percentile
0510204060Barclay Goodrow 12David Moss 12

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Barclay Goodrow
David Moss

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Barclay Goodrow C, SJS 2014-15 David Moss R, ARI
60 Games played 60
4 Goals 4
8 Assists 8
12 Points 12
0.20 Points per game 0.20
-1 Plus/minus -18
68 Shots 96
5.9 Shooting % 4.2
76 Hits 115
35 Penalty minutes 24
11:04 Average ice time 12:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.3 Corsi for % 49.3
-5.3 CF% relative to team +0.6
47.5 Fenwick for % 49.8
49.2 Expected goals for % 52.1
-3.0 xGF% relative to team +6.8
45.9 Goals for % 29.7
100.0 PDO 95.4
124 Shot attempts taken 144
Expected goals, all situations
5.6 Expected goals 11.5
0.50 Expected goals per 60 0.89
5.9% Chance per attempt 8.7%
-1.6 Goals above expected -7.5
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement +2.5
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.4
-2.5 Even-strength offence -0.1
+2.8 Even-strength defence +0.9
-0.1 Power play +0.4
+0.4 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.2 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$627K Cap hit $800K
$52K Cap dollars per point $67K
$1.9M Worth at the going rate $2.1M
+$1.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$1.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean