Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Brad Hunt Philip Larsen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerBrad Hunt: Goals, 0.08 a game, 73rd percentileBrad Hunt: Assists, 0.42 a game, 89th percentileBrad Hunt: Points, 0.50 a game, 86th percentileBrad Hunt: Shots, 1.17 a game, 41st percentileBrad Hunt: Hits, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileBrad Hunt: Corsi for %, 47.1%, 20th percentileBrad Hunt: CF% rel, -0.3, 48th percentileBrad Hunt: On-ice xG %, 38.9%, 1st percentileBrad Hunt: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 34th percentileBrad Hunt: Chances created, 0.22 xG per 60, 64th percentileBrad Hunt: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 58th percentileBrad Hunt: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 64th percentilePhilip Larsen: Goals, 0.04 a game, 32nd percentilePhilip Larsen: Assists, 0.19 a game, 49th percentilePhilip Larsen: Points, 0.23 a game, 45th percentilePhilip Larsen: Shots, 1.23 a game, 48th percentilePhilip Larsen: Hits, 0.46 a game, 8th percentilePhilip Larsen: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 24th percentilePhilip Larsen: CF% rel, -0.7, 42nd percentilePhilip Larsen: On-ice xG %, 40.8%, 1st percentilePhilip Larsen: Rating, -1.0 goals above replacement, 18th percentilePhilip Larsen: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 76th percentilePhilip Larsen: Shot quality, 3.7% a shot, 80th percentilePhilip Larsen: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 37th percentile
024620Brad Hunt 6Philip Larsen 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Brad Hunt
Philip Larsen

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Brad Hunt D, COL 2016-17 Philip Larsen D, VAN
12 Games played 26
1 Goals 1
5 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.50 Points per game 0.23
-1 Plus/minus -8
14 Shots 32
7.1 Shooting % 3.1
0 Hits 12
2 Penalty minutes 4
14:30 Average ice time 16:28
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.1 Corsi for % 47.6
-0.3 CF% relative to team -0.7
45.0 Fenwick for % 46.6
38.9 Expected goals for % 40.8
-3.8 xGF% relative to team -3.3
50.0 Goals for % 41.7
102.1 PDO 99.0
22 Shot attempts taken 48
Expected goals, all situations
0.6 Expected goals 1.8
0.22 Expected goals per 60 0.25
3.2% Chance per attempt 3.7%
+0.4 Goals above expected -0.8
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement -1.0
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.2
+0.1 Even-strength offence -0.3
-0.6 Even-strength defence -1.4
+0.1 Power play -0.5
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.0
-0.1 Penalties -0.3
Contract
$600K Cap hit $1.025M
$100K Cap dollars per point $171K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean