Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Luke Glendening Frans Nielsen

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLuke Glendening: Goals, 0.10 a game, 20th percentileLuke Glendening: Assists, 0.05 a game, 3rd percentileLuke Glendening: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileLuke Glendening: Shots, 1.27 a game, 27th percentileLuke Glendening: Hits, 2.45 a game, 92nd percentileLuke Glendening: Corsi for %, 40.5%, 1st percentileLuke Glendening: CF% rel, -5.7, 6th percentileLuke Glendening: On-ice xG %, 36.1%, 1st percentileLuke Glendening: Rating, -2.5 goals above replacement, 3rd percentileLuke Glendening: Chances created, 0.54 xG per 60, 12th percentileLuke Glendening: Shot quality, 7.9% a shot, 48th percentileLuke Glendening: Finishing, -3.2 goals above expected, 16th percentileFrans Nielsen: Goals, 0.07 a game, 8th percentileFrans Nielsen: Assists, 0.08 a game, 10th percentileFrans Nielsen: Points, 0.15 a game, 6th percentileFrans Nielsen: Shots, 1.43 a game, 37th percentileFrans Nielsen: Hits, 0.73 a game, 36th percentileFrans Nielsen: Corsi for %, 44.3%, 7th percentileFrans Nielsen: CF% rel, -2.6, 19th percentileFrans Nielsen: On-ice xG %, 39.1%, 1st percentileFrans Nielsen: Rating, -3.9 goals above replacement, 1st percentileFrans Nielsen: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 17th percentileFrans Nielsen: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 22nd percentileFrans Nielsen: Finishing, -3.8 goals above expected, 11th percentile
02468204060Luke Glendening 9Frans Nielsen 9

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Luke Glendening
Frans Nielsen

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Luke Glendening C, PHI 2019-20 Frans Nielsen C, DET
60 Games played 60
6 Goals 4
3 Assists 5
9 Points 9
0.15 Points per game 0.15
-29 Plus/minus -13
76 Shots 86
7.9 Shooting % 4.7
147 Hits 44
14 Penalty minutes 8
15:21 Average ice time 13:41
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
40.5 Corsi for % 44.3
-5.7 CF% relative to team -2.6
41.8 Fenwick for % 44.8
36.1 Expected goals for % 39.1
-8.1 xGF% relative to team -5.7
16.4 Goals for % 25.6
90.7 PDO 94.5
106 Shot attempts taken 104
Expected goals, all situations
8.2 Expected goals 7.8
0.54 Expected goals per 60 0.57
7.9% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-3.2 Goals above expected -3.8
Rating, in goals
-2.5 Goals above replacement -3.9
-0.4 Wins above replacement -0.7
-5.6 Even-strength offence -4.8
+0.6 Even-strength defence -0.1
-0.1 Power play -0.7
-0.4 Penalty kill -1.0
+0.6 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$1.8M Cap hit $5.25M
$200K Cap dollars per point $583K
-$1.4M Worth at the going rate -$2.6M
-$3.2M Value: worth minus cap hit -$7.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean