Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Luke Glendening John Mitchell

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLuke Glendening: Goals, 0.10 a game, 28th percentileLuke Glendening: Assists, 0.16 a game, 36th percentileLuke Glendening: Points, 0.26 a game, 32nd percentileLuke Glendening: Shots, 1.09 a game, 21st percentileLuke Glendening: Hits, 1.77 a game, 76th percentileLuke Glendening: Corsi for %, 45.2%, 9th percentileLuke Glendening: CF% rel, -8.4, 1st percentileLuke Glendening: On-ice xG %, 48.2%, 35th percentileLuke Glendening: Rating, +1.6 goals above replacement, 39th percentileLuke Glendening: Chances created, 0.47 xG per 60, 10th percentileLuke Glendening: Shot quality, 7.6% a shot, 56th percentileLuke Glendening: Finishing, -4.3 goals above expected, 13th percentileJohn Mitchell: Goals, 0.14 a game, 42nd percentileJohn Mitchell: Assists, 0.15 a game, 35th percentileJohn Mitchell: Points, 0.30 a game, 39th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shots, 1.42 a game, 40th percentileJohn Mitchell: Hits, 1.20 a game, 53rd percentileJohn Mitchell: Corsi for %, 42.1%, 2nd percentileJohn Mitchell: CF% rel, -2.0, 25th percentileJohn Mitchell: On-ice xG %, 41.0%, 3rd percentileJohn Mitchell: Rating, -0.5 goals above replacement, 18th percentileJohn Mitchell: Chances created, 0.59 xG per 60, 28th percentileJohn Mitchell: Shot quality, 8.3% a shot, 74th percentileJohn Mitchell: Finishing, -1.7 goals above expected, 36th percentile
0510152020406080Luke Glendening 21John Mitchell 21

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Luke Glendening
John Mitchell

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Luke Glendening C, PHI 2015-16 John Mitchell C, COL
81 Games played 71
8 Goals 10
13 Assists 11
21 Points 21
0.26 Points per game 0.30
4 Plus/minus -7
88 Shots 101
9.1 Shooting % 9.9
143 Hits 85
46 Penalty minutes 52
14:35 Average ice time 15:15
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.2 Corsi for % 42.1
-8.4 CF% relative to team -2.0
44.4 Fenwick for % 41.6
48.2 Expected goals for % 41.0
-2.7 xGF% relative to team -2.0
47.4 Goals for % 42.3
101.0 PDO 99.9
137 Shot attempts taken 136
Expected goals, all situations
9.3 Expected goals 10.7
0.47 Expected goals per 60 0.59
7.6% Chance per attempt 8.3%
-4.3 Goals above expected -1.7
Rating, in goals
+1.6 Goals above replacement -0.5
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
-2.7 Even-strength offence -1.9
+1.0 Even-strength defence +0.8
-0.1 Power play -0.6
+0.4 Penalty kill -0.7
-0.2 Penalties -1.1
Contract
$628K Cap hit $1.8M
$30K Cap dollars per point $86K
$1.6M Worth at the going rate $251K
+$964K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean