Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Luke Glendening Nate Thompson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLuke Glendening: Goals, 0.15 a game, 44th percentileLuke Glendening: Assists, 0.07 a game, 8th percentileLuke Glendening: Points, 0.22 a game, 22nd percentileLuke Glendening: Shots, 1.27 a game, 29th percentileLuke Glendening: Hits, 1.79 a game, 74th percentileLuke Glendening: Corsi for %, 44.4%, 13th percentileLuke Glendening: CF% rel, -11.6, 1st percentileLuke Glendening: On-ice xG %, 44.5%, 16th percentileLuke Glendening: Rating, -1.8 goals above replacement, 9th percentileLuke Glendening: Chances created, 0.46 xG per 60, 10th percentileLuke Glendening: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 46th percentileLuke Glendening: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 53rd percentileNate Thompson: Goals, 0.06 a game, 14th percentileNate Thompson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Points, 0.23 a game, 24th percentileNate Thompson: Shots, 1.09 a game, 17th percentileNate Thompson: Hits, 2.55 a game, 90th percentileNate Thompson: Corsi for %, 48.1%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: CF% rel, -4.2, 13th percentileNate Thompson: On-ice xG %, 47.8%, 33rd percentileNate Thompson: Rating, +1.0 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileNate Thompson: Chances created, 0.50 xG per 60, 16th percentileNate Thompson: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 44th percentileNate Thompson: Finishing, -3.9 goals above expected, 13th percentile
05101520406080Luke Glendening 18Nate Thompson 18

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Luke Glendening
Nate Thompson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Luke Glendening C, PHI 2014-15 Nate Thompson C, PHI
82 Games played 80
12 Goals 5
6 Assists 13
18 Points 18
0.22 Points per game 0.23
5 Plus/minus 0
104 Shots 87
11.5 Shooting % 5.7
147 Hits 204
34 Penalty minutes 39
14:43 Average ice time 13:19
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.4 Corsi for % 48.1
-11.6 CF% relative to team -4.2
44.7 Fenwick for % 48.3
44.5 Expected goals for % 47.8
-10.9 xGF% relative to team -5.0
53.8 Goals for % 47.2
102.1 PDO 100.1
124 Shot attempts taken 132
Expected goals, all situations
9.2 Expected goals 8.9
0.46 Expected goals per 60 0.50
7.3% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-0.2 Goals above expected -3.9
Rating, in goals
-1.8 Goals above replacement +1.0
-0.3 Wins above replacement +0.2
-5.0 Even-strength offence -3.6
+0.2 Even-strength defence +1.6
-0.1 Power play -0.2
-0.6 Penalty kill -0.2
+0.3 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$628K Cap hit $1.6M
$35K Cap dollars per point $89K
-$509K Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$1.1M Value: worth minus cap hit -$427K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean