Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Luke Glendening Tim Schaller

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerLuke Glendening: Goals, 0.04 a game, 6th percentileLuke Glendening: Assists, 0.15 a game, 29th percentileLuke Glendening: Points, 0.19 a game, 16th percentileLuke Glendening: Shots, 1.03 a game, 15th percentileLuke Glendening: Hits, 2.03 a game, 86th percentileLuke Glendening: Corsi for %, 43.0%, 3rd percentileLuke Glendening: CF% rel, -6.3, 5th percentileLuke Glendening: On-ice xG %, 44.8%, 13th percentileLuke Glendening: Rating, +0.9 goals above replacement, 32nd percentileLuke Glendening: Chances created, 0.51 xG per 60, 12th percentileLuke Glendening: Shot quality, 7.8% a shot, 54th percentileLuke Glendening: Finishing, -6.2 goals above expected, 5th percentileTim Schaller: Goals, 0.12 a game, 32nd percentileTim Schaller: Assists, 0.12 a game, 23rd percentileTim Schaller: Points, 0.24 a game, 25th percentileTim Schaller: Shots, 1.51 a game, 42nd percentileTim Schaller: Hits, 1.24 a game, 64th percentileTim Schaller: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 43rd percentileTim Schaller: CF% rel, -6.8, 4th percentileTim Schaller: On-ice xG %, 52.1%, 64th percentileTim Schaller: Rating, +3.1 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileTim Schaller: Chances created, 0.76 xG per 60, 58th percentileTim Schaller: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 29th percentileTim Schaller: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 31st percentile
0510204060Luke Glendening 14Tim Schaller 14

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Luke Glendening
Tim Schaller

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Luke Glendening C, PHI 2016-17 Tim Schaller L, LAK
74 Games played 59
3 Goals 7
11 Assists 7
14 Points 14
0.19 Points per game 0.24
-10 Plus/minus -6
76 Shots 89
3.9 Shooting % 7.9
150 Hits 73
26 Penalty minutes 23
12:55 Average ice time 12:16
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
43.0 Corsi for % 49.6
-6.3 CF% relative to team -6.8
44.6 Fenwick for % 49.9
44.8 Expected goals for % 52.1
-4.0 xGF% relative to team -4.1
39.5 Goals for % 42.9
98.5 PDO 98.2
108 Shot attempts taken 144
Expected goals, all situations
8.2 Expected goals 9.1
0.51 Expected goals per 60 0.76
7.8% Chance per attempt 7.0%
-6.2 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+0.9 Goals above replacement +3.1
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.5
-2.7 Even-strength offence +0.1
+2.2 Even-strength defence +0.5
-0.1 Power play -0.3
-0.7 Penalty kill +0.9
-0.6 Penalties -0.1
Contract
$628K Cap hit $600K
$45K Cap dollars per point $43K
$1.1M Worth at the going rate $2.6M
+$520K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean