Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Tanner Pearson Mike Richards

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Pearson: Goals, 0.29 a game, 83rd percentileTanner Pearson: Assists, 0.10 a game, 15th percentileTanner Pearson: Points, 0.38 a game, 45th percentileTanner Pearson: Shots, 1.62 a game, 46th percentileTanner Pearson: Hits, 1.10 a game, 44th percentileTanner Pearson: Corsi for %, 56.1%, 94th percentileTanner Pearson: CF% rel, 1.9, 68th percentileTanner Pearson: On-ice xG %, 54.8%, 82nd percentileTanner Pearson: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 39th percentileTanner Pearson: Chances created, 0.74 xG per 60, 55th percentileTanner Pearson: Shot quality, 6.5% a shot, 24th percentileTanner Pearson: Finishing, +4.1 goals above expected, 85th percentileMike Richards: Goals, 0.09 a game, 23rd percentileMike Richards: Assists, 0.21 a game, 43rd percentileMike Richards: Points, 0.30 a game, 32nd percentileMike Richards: Shots, 1.19 a game, 25th percentileMike Richards: Hits, 1.17 a game, 48th percentileMike Richards: Corsi for %, 51.6%, 60th percentileMike Richards: CF% rel, -4.0, 14th percentileMike Richards: On-ice xG %, 48.0%, 35th percentileMike Richards: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileMike Richards: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 31st percentileMike Richards: Shot quality, 7.0% a shot, 39th percentileMike Richards: Finishing, -2.1 goals above expected, 32nd percentile
0510152040Tanner Pearson 16Mike Richards 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Pearson
Mike Richards

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Pearson L, BUF 2014-15 Mike Richards C, WSH
42 Games played 53
12 Goals 5
4 Assists 11
16 Points 16
0.38 Points per game 0.30
14 Plus/minus -10
68 Shots 63
17.6 Shooting % 7.9
46 Hits 62
14 Penalty minutes 39
13:18 Average ice time 13:22
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
56.1 Corsi for % 51.6
+1.9 CF% relative to team -4.0
55.6 Fenwick for % 49.4
54.8 Expected goals for % 48.0
+1.8 xGF% relative to team -7.1
68.6 Goals for % 41.3
103.8 PDO 97.8
112 Shot attempts taken 101
Expected goals, all situations
6.9 Expected goals 7.1
0.74 Expected goals per 60 0.60
6.5% Chance per attempt 7.0%
+4.1 Goals above expected -2.1
Rating, in goals
+1.9 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.3 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.9 Even-strength offence -0.8
-0.5 Even-strength defence -2.1
-0.5 Power play -0.4
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.5
+0.1 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$736K Cap hit $5.75M
$46K Cap dollars per point $359K
$1.7M Worth at the going rate $290K
+$928K Value: worth minus cap hit -$5.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean