Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Tanner Pearson Drew Shore

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTanner Pearson: Goals, 0.12 a game, 35th percentileTanner Pearson: Assists, 0.16 a game, 32nd percentileTanner Pearson: Points, 0.28 a game, 33rd percentileTanner Pearson: Shots, 1.24 a game, 28th percentileTanner Pearson: Hits, 1.40 a game, 61st percentileTanner Pearson: Corsi for %, 55.1%, 89th percentileTanner Pearson: CF% rel, -1.3, 34th percentileTanner Pearson: On-ice xG %, 58.3%, 95th percentileTanner Pearson: Rating, +2.2 goals above replacement, 46th percentileTanner Pearson: Chances created, 0.84 xG per 60, 73rd percentileTanner Pearson: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 52nd percentileTanner Pearson: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 45th percentileDrew Shore: Goals, 0.21 a game, 63rd percentileDrew Shore: Assists, 0.08 a game, 15th percentileDrew Shore: Points, 0.29 a game, 35th percentileDrew Shore: Shots, 0.96 a game, 15th percentileDrew Shore: Hits, 0.96 a game, 41st percentileDrew Shore: Corsi for %, 51.3%, 60th percentileDrew Shore: CF% rel, -1.1, 36th percentileDrew Shore: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 8th percentileDrew Shore: Rating, -1.3 goals above replacement, 13th percentileDrew Shore: Chances created, 0.42 xG per 60, 7th percentileDrew Shore: Shot quality, 7.3% a shot, 45th percentileDrew Shore: Finishing, +3.0 goals above expected, 75th percentile
024620Tanner Pearson 7Drew Shore 7

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tanner Pearson
Drew Shore

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tanner Pearson L, BUF 2013-14 Drew Shore C, CAR
25 Games played 24
3 Goals 5
4 Assists 2
7 Points 7
0.28 Points per game 0.29
2 Plus/minus -1
31 Shots 23
9.7 Shooting % 21.7
35 Hits 23
8 Penalty minutes 8
10:49 Average ice time 12:00
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
55.1 Corsi for % 51.3
-1.3 CF% relative to team -1.1
55.3 Fenwick for % 48.7
58.3 Expected goals for % 42.6
+1.6 xGF% relative to team -9.4
55.6 Goals for % 46.2
100.6 PDO 99.7
57 Shot attempts taken 32
Expected goals, all situations
3.8 Expected goals 2.0
0.84 Expected goals per 60 0.42
7.4% Chance per attempt 7.3%
-0.8 Goals above expected +3.0
Rating, in goals
+2.2 Goals above replacement -1.3
+0.4 Wins above replacement -0.2
+0.3 Even-strength offence -1.5
+0.4 Even-strength defence -0.3
+0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.7 Penalties -0.3

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean