Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2012-13 season

At a glance

Filip Forsberg Austin Watson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerFilip Forsberg: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileFilip Forsberg: Assists, 0.20 a game, 47th percentileFilip Forsberg: Points, 0.20 a game, 21st percentileFilip Forsberg: Shots, 2.80 a game, 89th percentileFilip Forsberg: Hits, 0.60 a game, 21st percentileFilip Forsberg: Corsi for %, 45.7%, 18th percentileFilip Forsberg: CF% rel, -3.6, 21st percentileFilip Forsberg: On-ice xG %, 46.0%, 23rd percentileFilip Forsberg: Rating, -0.7 goals above replacement, 14th percentileFilip Forsberg: Chances created, 0.95 xG per 60, 86th percentileFilip Forsberg: Shot quality, 6.8% a shot, 28th percentileFilip Forsberg: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 37th percentileAustin Watson: Goals, 0.17 a game, 49th percentileAustin Watson: Assists, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileAustin Watson: Points, 0.17 a game, 17th percentileAustin Watson: Shots, 0.67 a game, 7th percentileAustin Watson: Hits, 0.33 a game, 6th percentileAustin Watson: Corsi for %, 49.1%, 44th percentileAustin Watson: CF% rel, -0.1, 51st percentileAustin Watson: On-ice xG %, 51.8%, 67th percentileAustin Watson: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 20th percentileAustin Watson: Chances created, 0.25 xG per 60, 1st percentileAustin Watson: Shot quality, 4.0% a shot, 1st percentileAustin Watson: Finishing, +0.7 goals above expected, 61st percentile
00.20.40.60.81Filip Forsberg 1Austin Watson 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Filip Forsberg
Austin Watson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Filip Forsberg L, NSH 2012-13 Austin Watson L, DET
5 Games played 6
0 Goals 1
1 Assists 0
1 Points 1
0.20 Points per game 0.17
-5 Plus/minus -2
14 Shots 4
0.0 Shooting % 25.0
3 Hits 2
0 Penalty minutes 0
15:29 Average ice time 12:42
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.7 Corsi for % 49.1
-3.6 CF% relative to team -0.1
44.7 Fenwick for % 50.6
46.0 Expected goals for % 51.8
-12.2 xGF% relative to team +0.0
20.0 Goals for % 33.3
93.6 PDO 90.3
20 Shot attempts taken 11
Expected goals, all situations
1.2 Expected goals 0.3
0.95 Expected goals per 60 0.25
6.8% Chance per attempt 4.0%
-1.2 Goals above expected +0.7
Rating, in goals
-0.7 Goals above replacement -0.1
-0.1 Wins above replacement 0.0
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.4
-0.7 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.1
0.0 Penalty kill -0.1
+0.0 Penalties +0.0

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean