Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Matt Murray Brian Elliott

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMatt Murray: Save %, 0.923, 80th percentileMatt Murray: Goals against, 2.27 a game, 69th percentileMatt Murray: Workload, 29.6 shots a game, 71st percentileMatt Murray: Games, 49 games, 49th percentileMatt Murray: Goals saved, +0.38 above expected per 60, 87th percentileBrian Elliott: Save %, 0.910, 25th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 40th percentileBrian Elliott: Workload, 27.3 shots a game, 36th percentileBrian Elliott: Games, 49 games, 49th percentileBrian Elliott: Goals saved, -0.13 above expected per 60, 22nd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Matt Murray G, SEA 2016-17 Brian Elliott G, TBL
49 Games played 49
32 Wins 26
10 Losses 18
4 Shutouts 2
1,450 Shots against 1,338
1,339 Saves 1,217
111 Goals against 121
0.923 Save % 0.910
2.41 Goals against average 2.55
Expected goals, while he was in net
128.7 Expected goals against 114.7
+17.7 Goals saved above expected -6.3
+0.38 Saved above expected per 60 -0.13
6.6% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+30.8 Goals above replacement +5.4
+5.1 Wins above replacement +0.9
Contract
$628K Cap hit $2.5M
$7.3M Worth at the going rate $1.8M
+$6.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$747K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean