Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Connor Carrick Nate Schmidt

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerConnor Carrick: Goals, 0.03 a game, 24th percentileConnor Carrick: Assists, 0.15 a game, 30th percentileConnor Carrick: Points, 0.18 a game, 23rd percentileConnor Carrick: Shots, 0.76 a game, 12th percentileConnor Carrick: Hits, 0.74 a game, 23rd percentileConnor Carrick: Corsi for %, 44.1%, 9th percentileConnor Carrick: CF% rel, -4.2, 12th percentileConnor Carrick: On-ice xG %, 47.0%, 24th percentileConnor Carrick: Rating, -0.9 goals above replacement, 20th percentileConnor Carrick: Chances created, 0.14 xG per 60, 29th percentileConnor Carrick: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 40th percentileConnor Carrick: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 47th percentileNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.07 a game, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.14 a game, 26th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.21 a game, 35th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.41 a game, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.62 a game, 16th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 56th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 3.1, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.2%, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 56th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 49th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 42nd percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 63rd percentile
024620Connor Carrick 6Nate Schmidt 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Connor Carrick
Nate Schmidt

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Connor Carrick D, BOS 2013-14 Nate Schmidt D, UTA
34 Games played 29
1 Goals 2
5 Assists 4
6 Points 6
0.18 Points per game 0.21
-9 Plus/minus 4
26 Shots 41
3.8 Shooting % 4.9
25 Hits 18
23 Penalty minutes 6
15:58 Average ice time 18:42
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
44.1 Corsi for % 50.7
-4.2 CF% relative to team +3.1
43.1 Fenwick for % 49.7
47.0 Expected goals for % 50.2
-2.9 xGF% relative to team +3.6
38.9 Goals for % 56.1
99.4 PDO 103.0
63 Shot attempts taken 69
Expected goals, all situations
1.3 Expected goals 1.6
0.14 Expected goals per 60 0.18
3.0% Chance per attempt 3.0%
-0.3 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
-0.9 Goals above replacement +2.5
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.4
-0.8 Even-strength offence +0.0
-1.1 Even-strength defence +0.2
-0.1 Power play -0.1
-0.1 Penalty kill 0.0
-0.6 Penalties +0.6
Contract
$637K Cap hit $925K
$106K Cap dollars per point $154K
$26K Worth at the going rate $2M
-$611K Value: worth minus cap hit +$1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean