Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.907, 16th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.61 a game, 20th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 28.1 shots a game, 45th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 56 games, 67th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 11th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.918, 67th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.51 a game, 35th percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 30.7 shots a game, 82nd percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 55 games, 64th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 58th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2016-17 Corey Crawford G, CHI
56 Games played 55
26 Wins 32
19 Losses 18
4 Shutouts 2
1,572 Shots against 1,691
1,426 Saves 1,553
146 Goals against 138
0.907 Save % 0.918
2.89 Goals against average 2.55
Expected goals, while he was in net
131.2 Expected goals against 143.1
-14.8 Goals saved above expected +5.1
-0.29 Saved above expected per 60 +0.09
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.3%
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +19.6
-0.2 Wins above replacement +3.3
Contract
$668K Cap hit $6M
$255K Worth at the going rate $4.8M
-$413K Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean