Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck Steve Mason

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.907, 16th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.61 a game, 20th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 28.1 shots a game, 45th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 56 games, 67th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, -0.29 above expected per 60, 11th percentileSteve Mason: Save %, 0.908, 20th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.47 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 33rd percentileSteve Mason: Games, 58 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, -0.16 above expected per 60, 16th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2016-17 Steve Mason G, WPG
56 Games played 58
26 Wins 26
19 Losses 21
4 Shutouts 3
1,572 Shots against 1,556
1,426 Saves 1,413
146 Goals against 143
0.907 Save % 0.908
2.89 Goals against average 2.66
Expected goals, while he was in net
131.2 Expected goals against 134.7
-14.8 Goals saved above expected -8.3
-0.29 Saved above expected per 60 -0.16
6.1% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
-1.5 Goals above replacement +5.4
-0.2 Wins above replacement +0.9
Contract
$668K Cap hit $4.1M
$255K Worth at the going rate $1.7M
-$413K Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.4M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean