Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck Cam Talbot

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.924, 82nd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.33 a game, 70th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 30.6 shots a game, 72nd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 67 games, 97th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, +0.21 above expected per 60, 72nd percentileCam Talbot: Save %, 0.908, 28th percentileCam Talbot: Goals against, 2.81 a game, 22nd percentileCam Talbot: Workload, 30.4 shots a game, 65th percentileCam Talbot: Games, 67 games, 97th percentileCam Talbot: Goals saved, +0.01 above expected per 60, 50th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 60 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2017-18 Cam Talbot G, CBJ
67 Games played 67
44 Wins 31
11 Losses 31
6 Shutouts 1
2,048 Shots against 2,036
1,892 Saves 1,848
156 Goals against 188
0.924 Save % 0.908
2.36 Goals against average 3.02
Expected goals, while he was in net
170.1 Expected goals against 188.7
+14.1 Goals saved above expected +0.7
+0.21 Saved above expected per 60 +0.01
6.0% Chance per attempt faced 6.8%
Rating, in goals
+31.4 Goals above replacement +20.0
+5.2 Wins above replacement +3.3
Contract
$2.25M Cap hit $4.167M
$7.7M Worth at the going rate $5.1M
+$5.5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$977K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean