Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck John Gibson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.922, 89th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.41 a game, 79th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 31.0 shots a game, 87th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 58 games, 97th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, +0.48 above expected per 60, 98th percentileJohn Gibson: Save %, 0.904, 26th percentileJohn Gibson: Goals against, 2.92 a game, 13th percentileJohn Gibson: Workload, 30.4 shots a game, 74th percentileJohn Gibson: Games, 51 games, 92nd percentileJohn Gibson: Goals saved, -0.08 above expected per 60, 37th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 61 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2019-20 John Gibson G, DET
58 Games played 51
31 Wins 20
21 Losses 26
6 Shutouts 1
1,796 Shots against 1,552
1,656 Saves 1,403
140 Goals against 149
0.922 Save % 0.904
2.57 Goals against average 3.00
Expected goals, while he was in net
166.0 Expected goals against 145.1
+26.0 Goals saved above expected -3.9
+0.48 Saved above expected per 60 -0.08
6.7% Chance per attempt faced 6.6%
Rating, in goals
+42.9 Goals above replacement +10.9
+7.2 Wins above replacement +1.8
Contract
$6.167M Cap hit $6.4M
$12M Worth at the going rate $3.6M
+$5.8M Value: worth minus cap hit -$2.8M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean