Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck Andrei Vasilevskiy

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.918, 60th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.15 a game, 77th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 26.3 shots a game, 23rd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 26 games, 26th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, +0.22 above expected per 60, 82nd percentileAndrei Vasilevskiy: Save %, 0.910, 32nd percentileAndrei Vasilevskiy: Goals against, 2.42 a game, 47th percentileAndrei Vasilevskiy: Workload, 26.9 shots a game, 44th percentileAndrei Vasilevskiy: Games, 24 games, 18th percentileAndrei Vasilevskiy: Goals saved, -0.39 above expected per 60, 4th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2015-16 Andrei Vasilevskiy G, TBL
26 Games played 24
13 Wins 11
11 Losses 10
2 Shutouts 1
683 Shots against 646
627 Saves 588
56 Goals against 58
0.918 Save % 0.910
2.34 Goals against average 2.76
Expected goals, while he was in net
61.3 Expected goals against 49.7
+5.3 Goals saved above expected -8.3
+0.22 Saved above expected per 60 -0.39
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 5.5%
Rating, in goals
+11.6 Goals above replacement -3.2
+1.9 Wins above replacement -0.5
Contract
$668K Cap hit $925K
$3.3M Worth at the going rate -$192K
+$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$1.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean