Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Connor Hellebuyck Andrew Hammond

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerConnor Hellebuyck: Save %, 0.918, 60th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals against, 2.15 a game, 77th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Workload, 26.3 shots a game, 23rd percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Games, 26 games, 26th percentileConnor Hellebuyck: Goals saved, +0.22 above expected per 60, 82nd percentileAndrew Hammond: Save %, 0.914, 39th percentileAndrew Hammond: Goals against, 2.54 a game, 23rd percentileAndrew Hammond: Workload, 29.7 shots a game, 85th percentileAndrew Hammond: Games, 24 games, 18th percentileAndrew Hammond: Goals saved, +0.03 above expected per 60, 54th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Connor Hellebuyck G, WPG 2015-16 Andrew Hammond G, NJD
26 Games played 24
13 Wins 7
11 Losses 11
2 Shutouts 1
683 Shots against 712
627 Saves 651
56 Goals against 61
0.918 Save % 0.914
2.34 Goals against average 2.65
Expected goals, while he was in net
61.3 Expected goals against 61.8
+5.3 Goals saved above expected +0.8
+0.22 Saved above expected per 60 +0.03
6.5% Chance per attempt faced 6.2%
Rating, in goals
+11.6 Goals above replacement +7.1
+1.9 Wins above replacement +1.2
Contract
$668K Cap hit $1.35M
$3.3M Worth at the going rate $2.3M
+$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit +$921K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean