Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Taylor Leier Matthew Peca

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTaylor Leier: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileTaylor Leier: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileTaylor Leier: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileTaylor Leier: Shots, 0.70 a game, 3rd percentileTaylor Leier: Hits, 0.70 a game, 31st percentileTaylor Leier: Corsi for %, 45.5%, 11th percentileTaylor Leier: CF% rel, -1.7, 29th percentileTaylor Leier: On-ice xG %, 46.7%, 22nd percentileTaylor Leier: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileTaylor Leier: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 7th percentileTaylor Leier: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 25th percentileTaylor Leier: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 57th percentileMatthew Peca: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileMatthew Peca: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileMatthew Peca: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileMatthew Peca: Shots, 0.90 a game, 12th percentileMatthew Peca: Hits, 0.90 a game, 45th percentileMatthew Peca: Corsi for %, 52.5%, 75th percentileMatthew Peca: CF% rel, 0.5, 52nd percentileMatthew Peca: On-ice xG %, 42.2%, 4th percentileMatthew Peca: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileMatthew Peca: Chances created, 0.60 xG per 60, 25th percentileMatthew Peca: Shot quality, 6.7% a shot, 21st percentileMatthew Peca: Finishing, -0.1 goals above expected, 52nd percentile
00.511.52Taylor Leier 2Matthew Peca 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Taylor Leier
Matthew Peca

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Taylor Leier L, PHI 2016-17 Matthew Peca C, STL
10 Games played 10
1 Goals 1
1 Assists 1
2 Points 2
0.20 Points per game 0.20
-1 Plus/minus -3
7 Shots 9
14.3 Shooting % 11.1
7 Hits 9
4 Penalty minutes 2
9:04 Average ice time 11:27
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.5 Corsi for % 52.5
-1.7 CF% relative to team +0.5
42.3 Fenwick for % 47.7
46.7 Expected goals for % 42.2
+1.7 xGF% relative to team -4.1
40.0 Goals for % 40.0
99.4 PDO 98.3
14 Shot attempts taken 22
Expected goals, all situations
0.7 Expected goals 1.1
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.60
6.9% Chance per attempt 6.7%
+0.3 Goals above expected -0.1
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement -0.4
+0.0 Wins above replacement -0.1
-0.4 Even-strength offence -0.4
+0.3 Even-strength defence +0.0
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.0
+0.0 Penalties -0.2
Contract
$780K Cap hit $796K
$390K Cap dollars per point $398K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean