Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Taylor Leier Peter Cehlarik

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTaylor Leier: Goals, 0.10 a game, 26th percentileTaylor Leier: Assists, 0.10 a game, 18th percentileTaylor Leier: Points, 0.20 a game, 18th percentileTaylor Leier: Shots, 0.70 a game, 3rd percentileTaylor Leier: Hits, 0.70 a game, 31st percentileTaylor Leier: Corsi for %, 45.5%, 11th percentileTaylor Leier: CF% rel, -1.7, 29th percentileTaylor Leier: On-ice xG %, 46.7%, 22nd percentileTaylor Leier: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentileTaylor Leier: Chances created, 0.45 xG per 60, 7th percentileTaylor Leier: Shot quality, 6.9% a shot, 25th percentileTaylor Leier: Finishing, +0.3 goals above expected, 57th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentilePeter Cehlarik: Assists, 0.18 a game, 40th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Points, 0.18 a game, 16th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shots, 0.73 a game, 3rd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Hits, 0.64 a game, 27th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Corsi for %, 51.8%, 70th percentilePeter Cehlarik: CF% rel, -0.9, 39th percentilePeter Cehlarik: On-ice xG %, 53.8%, 80th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Rating, +0.1 goals above replacement, 23rd percentilePeter Cehlarik: Chances created, 0.57 xG per 60, 20th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Shot quality, 10.4% a shot, 97th percentilePeter Cehlarik: Finishing, -1.5 goals above expected, 39th percentile
00.511.52Taylor Leier 2Peter Cehlarik 2

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Taylor Leier
Peter Cehlarik

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Taylor Leier L, PHI 2016-17 Peter Cehlarik L, BOS
10 Games played 11
1 Goals 0
1 Assists 2
2 Points 2
0.20 Points per game 0.18
-1 Plus/minus 0
7 Shots 8
14.3 Shooting % 0.0
7 Hits 7
4 Penalty minutes 0
9:04 Average ice time 13:55
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
45.5 Corsi for % 51.8
-1.7 CF% relative to team -0.9
42.3 Fenwick for % 54.1
46.7 Expected goals for % 53.8
+1.7 xGF% relative to team -1.5
40.0 Goals for % 50.0
99.4 PDO 98.4
14 Shot attempts taken 15
Expected goals, all situations
0.7 Expected goals 1.5
0.45 Expected goals per 60 0.57
6.9% Chance per attempt 10.4%
+0.3 Goals above expected -1.5
Rating, in goals
+0.1 Goals above replacement +0.1
+0.0 Wins above replacement +0.0
-0.4 Even-strength offence 0.0
+0.3 Even-strength defence -0.3
0.0 Power play -0.2
+0.0 Penalty kill 0.0
+0.0 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$780K Cap hit $743K
$390K Cap dollars per point $371K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean