Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Gemel Smith Adrian Kempe

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerGemel Smith: Goals, 0.18 a game, 55th percentileGemel Smith: Assists, 0.18 a game, 39th percentileGemel Smith: Points, 0.35 a game, 45th percentileGemel Smith: Shots, 1.12 a game, 20th percentileGemel Smith: Hits, 0.35 a game, 8th percentileGemel Smith: Corsi for %, 47.2%, 20th percentileGemel Smith: CF% rel, -1.6, 30th percentileGemel Smith: On-ice xG %, 49.4%, 45th percentileGemel Smith: Rating, -0.4 goals above replacement, 19th percentileGemel Smith: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 13th percentileGemel Smith: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 42nd percentileGemel Smith: Finishing, +1.0 goals above expected, 63rd percentileAdrian Kempe: Goals, 0.08 a game, 17th percentileAdrian Kempe: Assists, 0.16 a game, 33rd percentileAdrian Kempe: Points, 0.24 a game, 25th percentileAdrian Kempe: Shots, 1.28 a game, 30th percentileAdrian Kempe: Hits, 0.92 a game, 47th percentileAdrian Kempe: Corsi for %, 57.3%, 99th percentileAdrian Kempe: CF% rel, 2.3, 71st percentileAdrian Kempe: On-ice xG %, 56.4%, 94th percentileAdrian Kempe: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 31st percentileAdrian Kempe: Chances created, 0.52 xG per 60, 13th percentileAdrian Kempe: Shot quality, 6.0% a shot, 7th percentileAdrian Kempe: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 46th percentile
024620Gemel Smith 6Adrian Kempe 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Gemel Smith
Adrian Kempe

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Gemel Smith C, DET 2016-17 Adrian Kempe R, LAK
17 Games played 25
3 Goals 2
3 Assists 4
6 Points 6
0.35 Points per game 0.24
-1 Plus/minus -3
19 Shots 32
15.8 Shooting % 6.3
6 Hits 23
21 Penalty minutes 6
13:35 Average ice time 12:14
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
47.2 Corsi for % 57.3
-1.6 CF% relative to team +2.3
49.5 Fenwick for % 55.9
49.4 Expected goals for % 56.4
-0.2 xGF% relative to team +3.1
33.3 Goals for % 44.4
96.9 PDO 97.9
26 Shot attempts taken 53
Expected goals, all situations
2.0 Expected goals 2.7
0.52 Expected goals per 60 0.52
7.4% Chance per attempt 6.0%
+1.0 Goals above expected -0.7
Rating, in goals
-0.4 Goals above replacement +0.8
-0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
-0.3 Even-strength offence -1.6
-1.0 Even-strength defence +0.8
0.0 Power play +0.2
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
+0.1 Penalties +0.4
Contract
$645K Cap hit $894K
$108K Cap dollars per point $149K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean