Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Tim Schaller Garnet Hathaway

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Schaller: Goals, 0.06 a game, 12th percentileTim Schaller: Assists, 0.12 a game, 25th percentileTim Schaller: Points, 0.18 a game, 17th percentileTim Schaller: Shots, 1.06 a game, 20th percentileTim Schaller: Hits, 0.76 a game, 32nd percentileTim Schaller: Corsi for %, 46.4%, 18th percentileTim Schaller: CF% rel, 0.7, 54th percentileTim Schaller: On-ice xG %, 50.3%, 52nd percentileTim Schaller: Rating, +1.2 goals above replacement, 35th percentileTim Schaller: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 20th percentileTim Schaller: Shot quality, 5.9% a shot, 8th percentileTim Schaller: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 53rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileGarnet Hathaway: Assists, 0.21 a game, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Points, 0.21 a game, 25th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shots, 0.79 a game, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Hits, 3.57 a game, 99th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Corsi for %, 49.8%, 48th percentileGarnet Hathaway: CF% rel, 0.0, 46th percentileGarnet Hathaway: On-ice xG %, 53.0%, 72nd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Rating, +2.0 goals above replacement, 43rd percentileGarnet Hathaway: Chances created, 0.44 xG per 60, 7th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Shot quality, 7.7% a shot, 58th percentileGarnet Hathaway: Finishing, -1.2 goals above expected, 40th percentile
0123Tim Schaller 3Garnet Hathaway 3

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Schaller
Garnet Hathaway

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Schaller L, LAK 2015-16 Garnet Hathaway R, FLA
17 Games played 14
1 Goals 0
2 Assists 3
3 Points 3
0.18 Points per game 0.21
3 Plus/minus -1
18 Shots 11
5.6 Shooting % 0.0
13 Hits 50
2 Penalty minutes 31
8:19 Average ice time 12:01
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
46.4 Corsi for % 49.8
+0.7 CF% relative to team 0.0
50.7 Fenwick for % 52.3
50.3 Expected goals for % 53.0
+6.5 xGF% relative to team +3.4
66.7 Goals for % 50.0
102.9 PDO 99.2
23 Shot attempts taken 19
Expected goals, all situations
1.3 Expected goals 1.2
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.44
5.9% Chance per attempt 7.7%
-0.3 Goals above expected -1.2
Rating, in goals
+1.2 Goals above replacement +2.0
+0.2 Wins above replacement +0.3
-0.1 Even-strength offence -0.5
+0.5 Even-strength defence +1.5
0.0 Power play 0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.5 Penalties +0.5
Contract
$874K Cap hit $690K
$291K Cap dollars per point $230K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean