Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2019-20 season

At a glance

Tim Schaller Matthew Highmore

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerTim Schaller: Goals, 0.09 a game, 18th percentileTim Schaller: Assists, 0.02 a game, 1st percentileTim Schaller: Points, 0.11 a game, 3rd percentileTim Schaller: Shots, 0.92 a game, 10th percentileTim Schaller: Hits, 0.96 a game, 50th percentileTim Schaller: Corsi for %, 39.3%, 1st percentileTim Schaller: CF% rel, -12.3, 1st percentileTim Schaller: On-ice xG %, 39.6%, 2nd percentileTim Schaller: Rating, -2.1 goals above replacement, 5th percentileTim Schaller: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 13th percentileTim Schaller: Shot quality, 8.2% a shot, 57th percentileTim Schaller: Finishing, -0.6 goals above expected, 46th percentileMatthew Highmore: Goals, 0.06 a game, 7th percentileMatthew Highmore: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileMatthew Highmore: Points, 0.17 a game, 8th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shots, 0.97 a game, 12th percentileMatthew Highmore: Hits, 1.06 a game, 54th percentileMatthew Highmore: Corsi for %, 47.6%, 21st percentileMatthew Highmore: CF% rel, -1.9, 24th percentileMatthew Highmore: On-ice xG %, 42.6%, 6th percentileMatthew Highmore: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 26th percentileMatthew Highmore: Chances created, 0.55 xG per 60, 13th percentileMatthew Highmore: Shot quality, 7.4% a shot, 27th percentileMatthew Highmore: Finishing, -1.3 goals above expected, 40th percentile
02462040Tim Schaller 6Matthew Highmore 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Tim Schaller
Matthew Highmore

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Tim Schaller L, LAK 2019-20 Matthew Highmore C, OTT
53 Games played 36
5 Goals 2
1 Assists 4
6 Points 6
0.11 Points per game 0.17
-14 Plus/minus -1
49 Shots 35
10.2 Shooting % 5.7
51 Hits 38
14 Penalty minutes 6
11:34 Average ice time 9:49
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
39.3 Corsi for % 47.6
-12.3 CF% relative to team -1.9
40.5 Fenwick for % 45.3
39.6 Expected goals for % 42.6
-10.5 xGF% relative to team -5.2
24.3 Goals for % 50.0
95.0 PDO 102.0
77 Shot attempts taken 60
Expected goals, all situations
5.6 Expected goals 3.3
0.55 Expected goals per 60 0.55
8.2% Chance per attempt 7.4%
-0.6 Goals above expected -1.3
Rating, in goals
-2.1 Goals above replacement +0.6
-0.4 Wins above replacement +0.1
-3.4 Even-strength offence -2.0
-1.6 Even-strength defence +0.7
+0.5 Power play -0.1
+0.6 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.1 Penalties +0.9
Contract
$1.9M Cap hit $776K
$317K Cap dollars per point $129K
-$1.1M Worth at the going rate $1.2M
-$3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$375K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean