Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Toby Enstrom

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA		2015-16	Toby Enstrom D, WPG
	72	Games played	72
	2	Goals	2
	14	Assists	14
	16	Points	16
	0.22	Points per game	0.22
	12	Plus/minus	8
	80	Shots	50
	2.5	Shooting %	4.0
	69	Hits	25
	16	Penalty minutes	44
	18:04	Average ice time	20:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	50.7	Corsi for %	51.8
	+0.3	CF% relative to team	+0.1
	51.0	Fenwick for %	50.4
	50.9	Expected goals for %	49.0
	-0.2	xGF% relative to team	-1.2
	55.8	Goals for %	52.8
	101.1	PDO	100.9
	170	Shot attempts taken	102
Expected goals, all situations
	4.4	Expected goals	2.1
	0.20	Expected goals per 60	0.08
	3.5%	Chance per attempt	2.7%
	-2.4	Goals above expected	-0.1
Rating, in goals
	+8.3	Goals above replacement	-3.1
	+1.4	Wins above replacement	-0.5
	-0.7	Even-strength offence	-2.6
	+2.6	Even-strength defence	-1.9
	-0.1	Power play	-1.1
	+0.2	Penalty kill	-0.8
	+2.0	Penalties	-1.6
Contract
	$813K	Cap hit	$5.75M
	$51K	Cap dollars per point	$359K
	$5.8M	Worth at the going rate	-$1.4M
	+$5M	Value: worth minus cap hit	-$7.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean