Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2013-14 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Adam McQuaid

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.07 a game, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.14 a game, 26th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.21 a game, 35th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.41 a game, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.62 a game, 16th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 56th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 3.1, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.2%, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +2.5 goals above replacement, 56th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.18 xG per 60, 49th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.0% a shot, 42nd percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 63rd percentileAdam McQuaid: Goals, 0.03 a game, 28th percentileAdam McQuaid: Assists, 0.17 a game, 38th percentileAdam McQuaid: Points, 0.20 a game, 32nd percentileAdam McQuaid: Shots, 0.83 a game, 15th percentileAdam McQuaid: Hits, 1.80 a game, 71st percentileAdam McQuaid: Corsi for %, 50.5%, 54th percentileAdam McQuaid: CF% rel, -2.5, 27th percentileAdam McQuaid: On-ice xG %, 55.6%, 89th percentileAdam McQuaid: Rating, +1.8 goals above replacement, 50th percentileAdam McQuaid: Chances created, 0.07 xG per 60, 3rd percentileAdam McQuaid: Shot quality, 1.8% a shot, 1st percentileAdam McQuaid: Finishing, +0.4 goals above expected, 64th percentile
024620Nate Schmidt 6Adam McQuaid 6

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Adam McQuaid

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2013-14 Adam McQuaid D, CBJ
29 Games played 30
2 Goals 1
4 Assists 5
6 Points 6
0.21 Points per game 0.20
4 Plus/minus 12
41 Shots 25
4.9 Shooting % 4.0
18 Hits 54
6 Penalty minutes 69
18:42 Average ice time 16:03
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.7 Corsi for % 50.5
+3.1 CF% relative to team -2.5
49.7 Fenwick for % 51.6
50.2 Expected goals for % 55.6
+3.6 xGF% relative to team +2.2
56.1 Goals for % 66.7
103.0 PDO 105.0
69 Shot attempts taken 56
Expected goals, all situations
1.6 Expected goals 0.6
0.18 Expected goals per 60 0.07
3.0% Chance per attempt 1.8%
+0.4 Goals above expected +0.4
Rating, in goals
+2.5 Goals above replacement +1.8
+0.4 Wins above replacement +0.3
+0.0 Even-strength offence -0.8
+0.2 Even-strength defence +1.4
-0.1 Power play 0.0
0.0 Penalty kill +0.4
+0.6 Penalties -0.8
Contract
$925K Cap hit $1.567M
$154K Cap dollars per point $261K
$2M Worth at the going rate $1.6M
+$1M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean