Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Mark Fraser

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA		2014-15	Mark Fraser D, NJD
	39	Games played	34
	1	Goals	0
	3	Assists	4
	4	Points	4
	0.10	Points per game	0.12
	-2	Plus/minus	2
	40	Shots	19
	2.5	Shooting %	0.0
	34	Hits	85
	10	Penalty minutes	55
	13:53	Average ice time	16:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	54.1	Corsi for %	41.3
	+3.2	CF% relative to team	-5.8
	53.8	Fenwick for %	41.6
	53.6	Expected goals for %	40.8
	-1.6	xGF% relative to team	-6.9
	47.4	Goals for %	44.8
	98.2	PDO	101.6
	84	Shot attempts taken	49
Expected goals, all situations
	1.7	Expected goals	0.5
	0.19	Expected goals per 60	0.06
	3.1%	Chance per attempt	1.7%
	-0.7	Goals above expected	-0.5
Rating, in goals
	+0.6	Goals above replacement	-3.8
	+0.1	Wins above replacement	-0.6
	-1.0	Even-strength offence	-1.7
	0.0	Even-strength defence	-2.8
	0.0	Power play	0.0
	+0.1	Penalty kill	+0.4
	-0.3	Penalties	-1.6
Contract
	$625K	Cap hit	$550K
	$156K	Cap dollars per point	$138K
	$929K	Worth at the going rate	-$1.7M
	+$304K	Value: worth minus cap hit	-$2.3M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean