Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Erik Johnson

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.05 a game, 48th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.23 a game, 61st percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.28 a game, 59th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.00 a game, 25th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.85 a game, 29th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 53.5%, 88th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 2.7, 85th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 56.2%, 94th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +7.6 goals above replacement, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 69th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 4.0% a shot, 88th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 41st percentileErik Johnson: Goals, 0.04 a game, 39th percentileErik Johnson: Assists, 0.33 a game, 80th percentileErik Johnson: Points, 0.37 a game, 75th percentileErik Johnson: Shots, 2.09 a game, 86th percentileErik Johnson: Hits, 1.89 a game, 79th percentileErik Johnson: Corsi for %, 51.4%, 72nd percentileErik Johnson: CF% rel, 2.6, 83rd percentileErik Johnson: On-ice xG %, 46.0%, 17th percentileErik Johnson: Rating, +1.9 goals above replacement, 53rd percentileErik Johnson: Chances created, 0.24 xG per 60, 67th percentileErik Johnson: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 51st percentileErik Johnson: Finishing, -2.0 goals above expected, 18th percentile
051015204060Nate Schmidt 17Erik Johnson 17

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Erik Johnson

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2016-17 Erik Johnson D, COL
60 Games played 46
3 Goals 2
14 Assists 15
17 Points 17
0.28 Points per game 0.37
22 Plus/minus -6
60 Shots 96
5.0 Shooting % 2.1
51 Hits 87
16 Penalty minutes 9
15:29 Average ice time 22:05
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
53.5 Corsi for % 51.4
+2.7 CF% relative to team +2.6
52.4 Fenwick for % 50.5
56.2 Expected goals for % 46.0
+7.3 xGF% relative to team -0.6
65.6 Goals for % 41.0
104.2 PDO 97.1
135 Shot attempts taken 145
Expected goals, all situations
3.7 Expected goals 4.0
0.24 Expected goals per 60 0.24
4.0% Chance per attempt 3.1%
-0.7 Goals above expected -2.0
Rating, in goals
+7.6 Goals above replacement +1.9
+1.3 Wins above replacement +0.3
+1.3 Even-strength offence -0.1
+4.0 Even-strength defence -2.0
-0.1 Power play -0.2
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.6 Penalties +0.8
Contract
$813K Cap hit $6M
$48K Cap dollars per point $353K
$5.4M Worth at the going rate $1.8M
+$4.6M Value: worth minus cap hit -$4.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean