Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt David Schlemko

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 23rd percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.10 a game, 5th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.03 a game, 36th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.87 a game, 25th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 54.1%, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 3.2, 82nd percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 53.6%, 79th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 36th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 50th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 34th percentileDavid Schlemko: Goals, 0.02 a game, 18th percentileDavid Schlemko: Assists, 0.07 a game, 3rd percentileDavid Schlemko: Points, 0.09 a game, 3rd percentileDavid Schlemko: Shots, 1.02 a game, 35th percentileDavid Schlemko: Hits, 1.02 a game, 36th percentileDavid Schlemko: Corsi for %, 49.6%, 39th percentileDavid Schlemko: CF% rel, 3.2, 82nd percentileDavid Schlemko: On-ice xG %, 47.7%, 31st percentileDavid Schlemko: Rating, +0.8 goals above replacement, 37th percentileDavid Schlemko: Chances created, 0.12 xG per 60, 19th percentileDavid Schlemko: Shot quality, 2.3% a shot, 9th percentileDavid Schlemko: Finishing, -0.3 goals above expected, 42nd percentile
012342040Nate Schmidt 4David Schlemko 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
David Schlemko

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2014-15 David Schlemko D, MTL
39 Games played 44
1 Goals 1
3 Assists 3
4 Points 4
0.10 Points per game 0.09
-2 Plus/minus 1
40 Shots 45
2.5 Shooting % 2.2
34 Hits 45
10 Penalty minutes 12
13:53 Average ice time 15:20
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.1 Corsi for % 49.6
+3.2 CF% relative to team +3.2
53.8 Fenwick for % 50.1
53.6 Expected goals for % 47.7
-1.6 xGF% relative to team +1.1
47.4 Goals for % 49.0
98.2 PDO 99.5
84 Shot attempts taken 84
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 1.3
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.12
3.1% Chance per attempt 2.3%
-0.7 Goals above expected -0.3
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement +0.8
+0.1 Wins above replacement +0.1
-1.0 Even-strength offence -1.7
0.0 Even-strength defence +1.0
0.0 Power play -0.1
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.3
-0.3 Penalties -0.9
Contract
$625K Cap hit $1.188M
$156K Cap dollars per point $297K
$929K Worth at the going rate $1.1M
+$304K Value: worth minus cap hit -$133K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean