Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2014-15 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Matt Bartkowski

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 23rd percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.08 a game, 6th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.10 a game, 5th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.03 a game, 36th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.87 a game, 25th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 54.1%, 86th percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 3.2, 82nd percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 53.6%, 79th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +0.6 goals above replacement, 36th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.1% a shot, 50th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -0.7 goals above expected, 34th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileMatt Bartkowski: Assists, 0.09 a game, 9th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Points, 0.09 a game, 2nd percentileMatt Bartkowski: Shots, 1.43 a game, 61st percentileMatt Bartkowski: Hits, 1.87 a game, 70th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 46th percentileMatt Bartkowski: CF% rel, -2.1, 30th percentileMatt Bartkowski: On-ice xG %, 48.2%, 36th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Rating, -0.1 goals above replacement, 27th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 56th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Shot quality, 2.4% a shot, 11th percentileMatt Bartkowski: Finishing, -2.6 goals above expected, 7th percentile
012342040Nate Schmidt 4Matt Bartkowski 4

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Matt Bartkowski

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2014-15 Matt Bartkowski D, MIN
39 Games played 47
1 Goals 0
3 Assists 4
4 Points 4
0.10 Points per game 0.09
-2 Plus/minus -6
40 Shots 67
2.5 Shooting % 0.0
34 Hits 88
10 Penalty minutes 37
13:53 Average ice time 16:56
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
54.1 Corsi for % 50.1
+3.2 CF% relative to team -2.1
53.8 Fenwick for % 49.2
53.6 Expected goals for % 48.2
-1.6 xGF% relative to team -3.6
47.4 Goals for % 43.1
98.2 PDO 98.6
84 Shot attempts taken 136
Expected goals, all situations
1.7 Expected goals 2.6
0.19 Expected goals per 60 0.20
3.1% Chance per attempt 2.4%
-0.7 Goals above expected -2.6
Rating, in goals
+0.6 Goals above replacement -0.1
+0.1 Wins above replacement 0.0
-1.0 Even-strength offence -1.9
0.0 Even-strength defence -0.5
0.0 Power play +0.0
+0.1 Penalty kill +0.1
-0.3 Penalties -0.5
Contract
$625K Cap hit $1.25M
$156K Cap dollars per point $313K
$929K Worth at the going rate $473K
+$304K Value: worth minus cap hit -$777K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean