Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Jordie Benn

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA		2016-17	Jordie Benn D, TOR
	60	Games played	71
	3	Goals	4
	14	Assists	13
	17	Points	17
	0.28	Points per game	0.24
	22	Plus/minus	-4
	60	Shots	68
	5.0	Shooting %	5.9
	51	Hits	64
	16	Penalty minutes	28
	15:29	Average ice time	18:17
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
	53.5	Corsi for %	49.8
	+2.7	CF% relative to team	-1.2
	52.4	Fenwick for %	50.4
	56.2	Expected goals for %	48.6
	+7.3	xGF% relative to team	-1.6
	65.6	Goals for %	45.1
	104.2	PDO	98.8
	135	Shot attempts taken	139
Expected goals, all situations
	3.7	Expected goals	3.5
	0.24	Expected goals per 60	0.16
	4.0%	Chance per attempt	3.0%
	-0.7	Goals above expected	-0.5
Rating, in goals
	+7.6	Goals above replacement	-0.2
	+1.3	Wins above replacement	0.0
	+1.3	Even-strength offence	-1.2
	+4.0	Even-strength defence	-1.5
	-0.1	Power play	-0.8
	-0.1	Penalty kill	-0.5
	-0.6	Penalties	-0.5
Contract
	$813K	Cap hit	$1.1M
	$48K	Cap dollars per point	$65K
	$5.4M	Worth at the going rate	$463K
	+$4.6M	Value: worth minus cap hit	-$637K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean