Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2026-27 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Chris Tanev

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.17 a game, 36th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.33 a game, 65th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 1.67 a game, 81st percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 59.9%, 91st percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 4.2, 74th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 59.8%, 80th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +5.6 goals above replacement, 78th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 4.2% a shot, 71st percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -0.4 goals above expected, 15th percentileChris Tanev: Goals, 0.00 a game, 1st percentileChris Tanev: Assists, 0.17 a game, 42nd percentileChris Tanev: Points, 0.17 a game, 36th percentileChris Tanev: Shots, 0.17 a game, 6th percentileChris Tanev: Hits, 0.17 a game, 9th percentileChris Tanev: Corsi for %, 44.6%, 26th percentileChris Tanev: CF% rel, -6.1, 21st percentileChris Tanev: On-ice xG %, 45.7%, 31st percentileChris Tanev: Rating, +3.3 goals above replacement, 66th percentileChris Tanev: Chances created, 0.02 xG per 60, 2nd percentileChris Tanev: Shot quality, 1.4% a shot, 8th percentileChris Tanev: Finishing, 0.0 goals above expected, 68th percentile
00.20.40.60.81Nate Schmidt 1Chris Tanev 1

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Chris Tanev

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2026-27 Chris Tanev D, TOR
6 Games played 6
0 Goals 0
1 Assists 1
1 Points 1
0.17 Points per game 0.17
0 Plus/minus 1
8 Shots 1
0.0 Shooting % 0.0
10 Hits 1
0 Penalty minutes 0
20:50 Average ice time 16:51
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
59.9 Corsi for % 44.6
+4.2 CF% relative to team -6.1
58.4 Fenwick for % 44.8
59.8 Expected goals for % 45.7
+1.7 xGF% relative to team +0.8
50.0 Goals for % 60.0
97.4 PDO 104.1
20 Shot attempts taken 2
Expected goals, all situations
0.4 Expected goals 0.0
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.02
4.2% Chance per attempt 1.4%
-0.4 Goals above expected 0.0
Rating, in goals
+5.6 Goals above replacement +3.3
+0.9 Wins above replacement +0.6
-1.9 Even-strength offence -1.8
+2.8 Even-strength defence +3.3
-0.5 Power play 0.0
+0.2 Penalty kill -0.5
-0.1 Penalties +0.1
Contract
$3.5M Cap hit $4.5M
$3.5M Cap dollars per point $4.5M
$6.2M Worth at the going rate $4M
+$2.7M Value: worth minus cap hit -$486K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. The season is still being played, so each rating is projected over the whole season: the games played so far, plus the games left at the rate of the last three seasons and this one. What the advanced numbers mean