Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Brett Pesce

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.03 a game, 27th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.19 a game, 52nd percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.22 a game, 44th percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.11 a game, 41st percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.96 a game, 38th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.7%, 61st percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, 0.3, 58th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.9%, 62nd percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +8.3 goals above replacement, 88th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.20 xG per 60, 55th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.5% a shot, 67th percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -2.4 goals above expected, 9th percentileBrett Pesce: Goals, 0.06 a game, 54th percentileBrett Pesce: Assists, 0.17 a game, 44th percentileBrett Pesce: Points, 0.23 a game, 47th percentileBrett Pesce: Shots, 1.23 a game, 49th percentileBrett Pesce: Hits, 0.43 a game, 5th percentileBrett Pesce: Corsi for %, 50.5%, 58th percentileBrett Pesce: CF% rel, -1.4, 39th percentileBrett Pesce: On-ice xG %, 51.1%, 64th percentileBrett Pesce: Rating, +5.9 goals above replacement, 77th percentileBrett Pesce: Chances created, 0.19 xG per 60, 51st percentileBrett Pesce: Shot quality, 3.2% a shot, 55th percentileBrett Pesce: Finishing, -0.2 goals above expected, 49th percentile
051015204060Nate Schmidt 16Brett Pesce 16

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Brett Pesce

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2015-16 Brett Pesce D, NJD
72 Games played 69
2 Goals 4
14 Assists 12
16 Points 16
0.22 Points per game 0.23
12 Plus/minus -7
80 Shots 85
2.5 Shooting % 4.7
69 Hits 30
16 Penalty minutes 16
18:04 Average ice time 18:46
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.7 Corsi for % 50.5
+0.3 CF% relative to team -1.4
51.0 Fenwick for % 48.8
50.9 Expected goals for % 51.1
-0.2 xGF% relative to team +0.4
55.8 Goals for % 45.2
101.1 PDO 98.8
170 Shot attempts taken 147
Expected goals, all situations
4.4 Expected goals 4.2
0.20 Expected goals per 60 0.19
3.5% Chance per attempt 3.2%
-2.4 Goals above expected -0.2
Rating, in goals
+8.3 Goals above replacement +5.9
+1.4 Wins above replacement +1.0
-0.7 Even-strength offence -2.3
+2.6 Even-strength defence +3.0
-0.1 Power play +0.1
+0.2 Penalty kill +0.7
+2.0 Penalties +0.2
Contract
$813K Cap hit $809K
$51K Cap dollars per point $51K
$5.8M Worth at the going rate $4.3M
+$5M Value: worth minus cap hit +$3.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean