Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

Nate Schmidt Zach Werenski

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerNate Schmidt: Goals, 0.07 a game, 54th percentileNate Schmidt: Assists, 0.41 a game, 89th percentileNate Schmidt: Points, 0.47 a game, 83rd percentileNate Schmidt: Shots, 1.36 a game, 49th percentileNate Schmidt: Hits, 0.54 a game, 11th percentileNate Schmidt: Corsi for %, 50.1%, 53rd percentileNate Schmidt: CF% rel, -1.3, 35th percentileNate Schmidt: On-ice xG %, 50.5%, 57th percentileNate Schmidt: Rating, +5.4 goals above replacement, 78th percentileNate Schmidt: Chances created, 0.21 xG per 60, 54th percentileNate Schmidt: Shot quality, 3.6% a shot, 81st percentileNate Schmidt: Finishing, -0.8 goals above expected, 32nd percentileZach Werenski: Goals, 0.21 a game, 99th percentileZach Werenski: Assists, 0.27 a game, 71st percentileZach Werenski: Points, 0.48 a game, 84th percentileZach Werenski: Shots, 2.69 a game, 93rd percentileZach Werenski: Hits, 0.75 a game, 23rd percentileZach Werenski: Corsi for %, 54.3%, 92nd percentileZach Werenski: CF% rel, 3.9, 88th percentileZach Werenski: On-ice xG %, 53.1%, 79th percentileZach Werenski: Rating, +7.6 goals above replacement, 88th percentileZach Werenski: Chances created, 0.40 xG per 60, 96th percentileZach Werenski: Shot quality, 4.1% a shot, 95th percentileZach Werenski: Finishing, +4.4 goals above expected, 95th percentile
0102030204060Zach Werenski 37Nate Schmidt 36

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

Nate Schmidt
Zach Werenski

Darker red means more attempts from that spot, and each dot is a goal. "Show every shot" switches to a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

Nate Schmidt D, UTA 2017-18 Zach Werenski D, CBJ
76 Games played 77
5 Goals 16
31 Assists 21
36 Points 37
0.47 Points per game 0.48
19 Plus/minus 8
103 Shots 207
4.9 Shooting % 7.7
41 Hits 58
16 Penalty minutes 16
22:14 Average ice time 22:35
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
50.1 Corsi for % 54.3
-1.3 CF% relative to team +3.9
50.0 Fenwick for % 55.3
50.5 Expected goals for % 53.1
-0.3 xGF% relative to team +0.5
56.3 Goals for % 57.4
101.9 PDO 100.6
193 Shot attempts taken 278
Expected goals, all situations
5.8 Expected goals 11.6
0.21 Expected goals per 60 0.40
3.6% Chance per attempt 4.1%
-0.8 Goals above expected +4.4
Rating, in goals
+5.4 Goals above replacement +7.6
+0.9 Wins above replacement +1.3
-0.7 Even-strength offence +3.9
+1.1 Even-strength defence -2.2
-1.0 Power play -1.3
+0.0 Penalty kill +0.1
+0.3 Penalties +1.3
Contract
$2.225M Cap hit $925K
$62K Cap dollars per point $25K
$4.1M Worth at the going rate $5.5M
+$1.8M Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean