Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Roberto Luongo

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.914, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 60th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 38th percentileMike Condon: Games, 41 games, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 51st percentileRoberto Luongo: Save %, 0.915, 47th percentileRoberto Luongo: Goals against, 2.60 a game, 22nd percentileRoberto Luongo: Workload, 30.4 shots a game, 80th percentileRoberto Luongo: Games, 40 games, 42nd percentileRoberto Luongo: Goals saved, -0.08 above expected per 60, 33rd percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2016-17 Roberto Luongo G, FLA
41 Games played 40
19 Wins 17
14 Losses 15
5 Shutouts 1
1,122 Shots against 1,217
1,026 Saves 1,113
96 Goals against 104
0.914 Save % 0.915
2.48 Goals against average 2.68
Expected goals, while he was in net
96.7 Expected goals against 100.8
+0.7 Goals saved above expected -3.2
+0.02 Saved above expected per 60 -0.08
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
+10.6 Goals above replacement +7.1
+1.8 Wins above replacement +1.2
Contract
$575K Cap hit $5.333M
$2.9M Worth at the going rate $2.1M
+$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$3.2M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean