Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Craig Anderson

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.914, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 60th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 38th percentileMike Condon: Games, 41 games, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 51st percentileCraig Anderson: Save %, 0.926, 91st percentileCraig Anderson: Goals against, 2.30 a game, 64th percentileCraig Anderson: Workload, 31.2 shots a game, 89th percentileCraig Anderson: Games, 40 games, 42nd percentileCraig Anderson: Goals saved, +0.25 above expected per 60, 78th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2016-17 Craig Anderson G, BUF
41 Games played 40
19 Wins 25
14 Losses 11
5 Shutouts 5
1,122 Shots against 1,247
1,026 Saves 1,155
96 Goals against 92
0.914 Save % 0.926
2.48 Goals against average 2.28
Expected goals, while he was in net
96.7 Expected goals against 102.1
+0.7 Goals saved above expected +10.1
+0.02 Saved above expected per 60 +0.25
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+10.6 Goals above replacement +20.5
+1.8 Wins above replacement +3.4
Contract
$575K Cap hit $4.2M
$2.9M Worth at the going rate $5M
+$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit +$814K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean