Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Corey Crawford

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.903, 11th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 19th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 31st percentileMike Condon: Games, 55 games, 74th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 11th percentileCorey Crawford: Save %, 0.924, 90th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals against, 2.26 a game, 63rd percentileCorey Crawford: Workload, 29.6 shots a game, 84th percentileCorey Crawford: Games, 58 games, 79th percentileCorey Crawford: Goals saved, +0.32 above expected per 60, 88th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2015-16 Corey Crawford G, CHI
55 Games played 58
21 Wins 35
25 Losses 18
1 Shutouts 7
1,458 Shots against 1,718
1,317 Saves 1,587
141 Goals against 131
0.903 Save % 0.924
2.71 Goals against average 2.37
Expected goals, while he was in net
124.6 Expected goals against 148.9
-16.4 Goals saved above expected +17.9
-0.32 Saved above expected per 60 +0.32
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.5%
Rating, in goals
-3.7 Goals above replacement +33.0
-0.6 Wins above replacement +5.5
Contract
$575K Cap hit $6M
-$312K Worth at the going rate $8.5M
-$887K Value: worth minus cap hit +$2.5M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean