Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Steve Mason

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.903, 11th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 19th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 31st percentileMike Condon: Games, 55 games, 74th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 11th percentileSteve Mason: Save %, 0.918, 55th percentileSteve Mason: Goals against, 2.44 a game, 42nd percentileSteve Mason: Workload, 29.7 shots a game, 85th percentileSteve Mason: Games, 54 games, 71st percentileSteve Mason: Goals saved, +0.09 above expected per 60, 61st percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2015-16 Steve Mason G, WPG
55 Games played 54
21 Wins 23
25 Losses 19
1 Shutouts 4
1,458 Shots against 1,602
1,317 Saves 1,470
141 Goals against 132
0.903 Save % 0.918
2.71 Goals against average 2.51
Expected goals, while he was in net
124.6 Expected goals against 136.6
-16.4 Goals saved above expected +4.6
-0.32 Saved above expected per 60 +0.09
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.4%
Rating, in goals
-3.7 Goals above replacement +18.6
-0.6 Wins above replacement +3.1
Contract
$575K Cap hit $4.1M
-$312K Worth at the going rate $5M
-$887K Value: worth minus cap hit +$912K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean