Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2016-17 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Jonathan Bernier

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.914, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.34 a game, 60th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 27.4 shots a game, 38th percentileMike Condon: Games, 41 games, 45th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, +0.02 above expected per 60, 51st percentileJonathan Bernier: Save %, 0.915, 56th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 78th percentileJonathan Bernier: Workload, 25.2 shots a game, 15th percentileJonathan Bernier: Games, 39 games, 38th percentileJonathan Bernier: Goals saved, +0.15 above expected per 60, 67th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 55 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2016-17 Jonathan Bernier G, NJD
41 Games played 39
19 Wins 21
14 Losses 7
5 Shutouts 2
1,122 Shots against 982
1,026 Saves 899
96 Goals against 83
0.914 Save % 0.915
2.48 Goals against average 2.50
Expected goals, while he was in net
96.7 Expected goals against 88.0
+0.7 Goals saved above expected +5.0
+0.02 Saved above expected per 60 +0.15
5.9% Chance per attempt faced 5.9%
Rating, in goals
+10.6 Goals above replacement +13.9
+1.8 Wins above replacement +2.3
Contract
$575K Cap hit $4.15M
$2.9M Worth at the going rate $3.6M
+$2.3M Value: worth minus cap hit -$555K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean