Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2015-16 season

At a glance

Mike Condon Petr Mrazek

Save %Goals againstWorkloadGamesGoals savedThe typical playerMike Condon: Save %, 0.903, 11th percentileMike Condon: Goals against, 2.56 a game, 19th percentileMike Condon: Workload, 26.5 shots a game, 31st percentileMike Condon: Games, 55 games, 74th percentileMike Condon: Goals saved, -0.32 above expected per 60, 11th percentilePetr Mrazek: Save %, 0.921, 79th percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals against, 2.13 a game, 82nd percentilePetr Mrazek: Workload, 26.8 shots a game, 39th percentilePetr Mrazek: Games, 54 games, 71st percentilePetr Mrazek: Goals saved, +0.11 above expected per 60, 68th percentile

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the 62 goalies who played at least a quarter as many games as the busiest. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number.

The numbers

Mike Condon G, OTT 2015-16 Petr Mrazek G, ANA
55 Games played 54
21 Wins 27
25 Losses 16
1 Shutouts 4
1,458 Shots against 1,448
1,317 Saves 1,333
141 Goals against 115
0.903 Save % 0.921
2.71 Goals against average 2.33
Expected goals, while he was in net
124.6 Expected goals against 120.6
-16.4 Goals saved above expected +5.6
-0.32 Saved above expected per 60 +0.11
6.2% Chance per attempt faced 6.1%
Rating, in goals
-3.7 Goals above replacement +17.9
-0.6 Wins above replacement +3.0
Contract
$575K Cap hit $738K
-$312K Worth at the going rate $4.8M
-$887K Value: worth minus cap hit +$4.1M

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean