Hockey Terminal
Be a GM

Compare players, 2017-18 season

At a glance

John Gilmour Scott Harrington

GoalsAssistsPointsShotsHitsCorsi for %CF% relOn-ice xG %RatingChances createdShot qualityFinishingThe typical playerJohn Gilmour: Goals, 0.07 a game, 56th percentileJohn Gilmour: Assists, 0.11 a game, 16th percentileJohn Gilmour: Points, 0.18 a game, 23rd percentileJohn Gilmour: Shots, 2.18 a game, 84th percentileJohn Gilmour: Hits, 0.96 a game, 33rd percentileJohn Gilmour: Corsi for %, 49.4%, 45th percentileJohn Gilmour: CF% rel, 4.6, 92nd percentileJohn Gilmour: On-ice xG %, 47.6%, 27th percentileJohn Gilmour: Rating, -0.2 goals above replacement, 27th percentileJohn Gilmour: Chances created, 0.37 xG per 60, 93rd percentileJohn Gilmour: Shot quality, 3.3% a shot, 66th percentileJohn Gilmour: Finishing, -0.9 goals above expected, 30th percentileScott Harrington: Goals, 0.06 a game, 50th percentileScott Harrington: Assists, 0.09 a game, 11th percentileScott Harrington: Points, 0.16 a game, 19th percentileScott Harrington: Shots, 0.88 a game, 11th percentileScott Harrington: Hits, 1.09 a game, 41st percentileScott Harrington: Corsi for %, 43.8%, 4th percentileScott Harrington: CF% rel, -7.9, 1st percentileScott Harrington: On-ice xG %, 40.1%, 1st percentileScott Harrington: Rating, -0.8 goals above replacement, 22nd percentileScott Harrington: Chances created, 0.17 xG per 60, 33rd percentileScott Harrington: Shot quality, 2.9% a shot, 42nd percentileScott Harrington: Finishing, +0.8 goals above expected, 61st percentile
01234520John Gilmour 5Scott Harrington 5

On the radar, each spoke runs from the lowest at the centre to the league leader at the rim, among the regulars at his position: forwards against forwards, defencemen against defencemen. The gap between two players on a spoke is the real gap between their numbers. The dashed shape is the typical player. Hover over a dot for the number. The lines are each player's points adding up, game by game.

Where they shot from

John Gilmour
Scott Harrington

There is a dot for each attempt, bigger for a better chance. "Show as heat map" shades the ice by where the attempts came from. Click a line in a key to filter its map.

The numbers

John Gilmour D, BUF 2017-18 Scott Harrington D, ANA
28 Games played 32
2 Goals 2
3 Assists 3
5 Points 5
0.18 Points per game 0.16
-11 Plus/minus 0
61 Shots 28
3.3 Shooting % 7.1
27 Hits 35
14 Penalty minutes 8
17:11 Average ice time 13:18
Five-on-five, while he was on the ice
49.4 Corsi for % 43.8
+4.6 CF% relative to team -7.9
49.2 Fenwick for % 44.4
47.6 Expected goals for % 40.1
+3.4 xGF% relative to team -8.5
42.1 Goals for % 51.7
98.3 PDO 102.1
108 Shot attempts taken 52
Expected goals, all situations
2.9 Expected goals 1.2
0.37 Expected goals per 60 0.17
3.3% Chance per attempt 2.9%
-0.9 Goals above expected +0.8
Rating, in goals
-0.2 Goals above replacement -0.8
0.0 Wins above replacement -0.1
+0.6 Even-strength offence -1.6
-1.5 Even-strength defence -0.2
-0.1 Power play +0.0
-0.1 Penalty kill +0.2
-0.8 Penalties -0.6
Contract
$743K Cap hit $675K
$149K Cap dollars per point $135K
$470K Worth at the going rate $76K
-$273K Value: worth minus cap hit -$599K

The better value in each stat is highlighted. Stats where more is not clearly better, such as games played, are not judged. Bars show each value against the larger of the two. What the advanced numbers mean